Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 11
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2005-03-03
Snippet: 051,5366.055,6 366.093,7 366.095,8 366.14,9 and 366.80—366.85,10 to utilities owned and operated by municipalities
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-02
Citation: 820 So. 2d 297, 2002 WL 825704
Snippet: 366.051, 366.055, 366.093, 366.095, 366.14, and 366.80 366.85, ... to the sale of electricity, manufactured
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-04-20
Citation: 767 So. 2d 428, 2000 WL 422871
Snippet: Statutes (1997), provides: "For the purposes of ss. 366.80-366.85 [FEECA], and 403.519, `utility' means any
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-29
Citation: 668 So. 2d 982
Snippet: Electric Company, and Gulf Power Company. See §§ 366.80-366.85, 403.519, Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.Admin.Code
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-10-28
Citation: 626 So. 2d 660, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 558, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1737, 1993 WL 433788
Snippet: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act, sections 366.80.85, Florida Statutes (1991). Specifically, the
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-11-15
Citation: 569 So. 2d 1268, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1616, 1990 WL 179073
Snippet: Efficiency and Conservation Act (FEECA), sections 366.80-.85, 403.519, Florida Statutes (1989). Pursuant
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-10
Citation: 452 So. 2d 1050, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14196
Snippet: against Universal as to those cases (Nos. 80-362, 80-366, 80-395, 80-403, 80-406 and 80-408) cannot be reinstated
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-08-18
Citation: 436 So. 2d 383
Snippet: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act, sections 366.80 to 366.85, Florida Statutes (1981). In that act
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-02-22
Citation: 196 So. 2d 425, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3963
Snippet: Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Armstrong, 71 Kan. 366, 80 P. 978, 1 LRA(NS) 113, 114 Am St Rep 474.” (39
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-06-27
Citation: 105 So. 323, 90 Fla. 88
Snippet: Atchison, T. S. F. Ry Co. v. Armstrong, 71 Kan. 366,80 Pac. Rep. 978, 1 L. R. A. (N.S.) 113, text 127;
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-05-12
Citation: 85 Fla. 485, 96 So. 838
Snippet: Racine, 26 Wis. 449; Flood v. Libby, 38 Wash. 366, 80 Pac. Rep. 533, 107 Am. St. Rep. 851; Vaughn v.