Cases from cite.case.law:

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, v. POWHATAN ENERGY FUND, LLC, CU, 286 F. Supp. 3d 751 (E.D. Va. 2017)

. . . . §§ 385.101 et seq. . . .

TOTAL GAS POWER NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION A. In D. In ALJ A. In, 859 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . . §§ 385.101-2202. . . .

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, v. BARCLAYS BANK PLC, 247 F. Supp. 3d 1118 (E.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . (investigations), 385.101, et seq. (rules of practice). . . .

J. ANDERSEN, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PPL LLC,, 583 F. App'x 747 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 385.101(e). . . . substantial similarity between Andersen’s earlier raised issues and his final complaint, and 18 C.F.R. § 385.101 . . .

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, HENWOOD ASSOCIATES, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, AMERICAN RIVERS, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 966 F.2d 1541 (9th Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 385.101(e). . . .

WILLISTON BASIN INTERSTATE PIPELINE COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, 874 F.2d 834 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 385.101(a)(1), requires FERC jurisdictional companies such as Williston to include in their pleadings . . .

ALICEVILLE HYDRO ASSOCIATES, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 800 F.2d 1147 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 385.101 (emphasis added). . . .

ALICEVILLE HYDRO ASSOCIATES, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 255 U.S. App. D.C. 122 (D.C. Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 385.101 (emphasis added). . . .

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, P. U. C. DSI, 770 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§' 385.101-385.2202, and include FERC’s rules regarding ex parte communications. . . .

NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 746 F.2d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 385.101(c)(2) (1983). . . .