Florida Statute 463.011 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

463.011 Exhibition of license.—Each person to whom a license or branch office license is issued by the department shall keep said license conspicuously displayed in the appropriate office and shall, whenever required, exhibit said license to any authorized representative of the department.

History.—ss. 1, 6, ch. 79-194; s. 317, ch. 81-259; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; s. 35, ch. 85-175; s. 2, ch. 85-278; ss. 11, 20, 21, ch. 86-289; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

Cases Citing F.S. 463.011

Fla. Stat. § 463.011 (2026) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Amendments
7 resultsSort: Relevance · Newest · Treatment
Copy
·Pushkin v. Lombard, 279 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).
Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
construing the meaning and rights of appellees under § 463.11(2)(a) and (d), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. We hold that
0 red0 yellow2 green6 procedural
Cited as authoritySIRPAL (2010)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityRae (2000)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cert. deniedBerenguer (2004)
phrase: "cert. denied"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
·Cole Vision v. Dept. of Bus. & Prof., 688 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1997 WL 60865
...Finally, contrary to appellants' arguments, the Board has the authority to regulate the business aspects of an optometrist's practice. Chapter 463 contains various provisions that regulate the "business" aspect of an optometrist's practice. See e.g., § 463.005(1)(d), (e), Fla. Stat. (1993); § 463.009, Fla. Stat. (1993); § 463.011, Fla....
0 red1 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"(citing case) (2002)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityWadley (2003)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2001)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Open case for full Syfertize analysis →
Copy
Walker v. Fla. St. Bd. of Optometry, 322 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
two counts of a complaint alleging violations of § 463.11 (2)(a), Fla. Stat.[1] and the rules of the Board
Copy
S. S. Hollender, Inc. v. Morqus, 23 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1945).
Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 156 Fla. 173, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 789
Chapter 19031, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1939 (Section 463.11, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A.), providing
Copy
Fisher v. Schumacher, 72 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1954).
Cited 1 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1454
proper performance of its duties under the act. Section 463.11, Florida Statutes 1951, F.SA., provides that
Copy
Will Ross, Inc. v. Florida State Bd. of Optometry, 314 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13675
disciplinary matters involving optometrists. Section 463.11(3) further provides that it is unlawful for
Copy
Rifkin v. Florida Real Est. Comm'n, 345 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).
Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida
Therapists — Section 468.-217(l)(c) Optometry — Section 463.11(l)(b) Osteopaths — Section 459.14(2)(a) Pest

This Florida statute resource is curated by the lawyer who curates this resource, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.

Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

Cases Citing F.S. 463.011

·Pushkin v. Lombard, 279 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

·Cole Vision v. Dept. of Bus. & Prof., 688 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Walker v. Fla. St. Bd. of Optometry, 322 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

S. S. Hollender, Inc. v. Morqus, 23 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1945).

Fisher v. Schumacher, 72 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1954).

Will Ross, Inc. v. Florida State Bd. of Optometry, 314 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Rifkin v. Florida Real Est. Comm'n, 345 So. 2d 349 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).