Florida Statute 501.91 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 501
CONSUMER PROTECTION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 501.91

501.91 Short title.—Sections 501.91-501.923 may be cited as the “Antifreeze Act of 1978.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 78-199; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 4, 5, ch. 89-4; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 501.91 on Google Scholar

F.S. 501.91 on Casetext

Amendments to 501.91

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 501.91

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 501.91.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 501.91

Total Results: 4

Perelman v. Estate of Perelman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 124 So. 3d 983

Snippet: judicial decree. Mangold v. Neuman, 371 Pa. 496, 501, 91 A.2d 904, 905 (1952). The Register’s decision on

State, Dept. of Agriculture v. Quick Cash of Tallahasee, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-12-03T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 609 So. 2d 735

Snippet: violation of chapter 501, other than a violation of ss. 501.91-501.923 [the "Antifreeze Act of 1978"…a violation of chapter 501 (other than sections 501.91 through 501.923) constituting an immediate danger…hapter 501, other than a violation of [s]ections 501.91-501.923, if it has reason to believe that a violation… chapter 501, Florida Statutes (except sections 501.91 through 501.923) to be unsupported by any such

Quick Cash v. STATE, DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-08-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 605 So. 2d 898

Snippet: violation of chapter 501, other than a violation of ss. 501.91-501.923, has occurred, the division with the coordination

Hall v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1921-08-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 84 Fla. 9, 93 So. 151

Snippet: N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Harris, 115 Tenn. 501, 91 S. W. Rep. 211; Davis v. Tacoma Ry. & Power