Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-23
Snippet: circumstance.’” Id. (quoting Carlisle, 593 So. 2d at 507-08). Although we recognize that the decision
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-03
Snippet: Barefoot Cottages Dev. Co., LLC, 156 So. 3d 506, 507-08, 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). See also Uoweit, LLC
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-06-08
Snippet: acquittal de novo.” Demus v. State, 281 So. 3d 505, 507-08 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). “The question presented by
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-12-01
Snippet: v. Barefoot Cottages Dev. Co., 156 So. 3d 506, 507–08, 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). “But the court in Biel
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-01-27
Snippet: Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So. 2d 505, 507–08 (Fla. 1992)). Although described as a two-step
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-12-02
Snippet: pending charges or a defense to those charges. Id. at 507-08. The court also found that, with respect to impeachment
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-07-22
Snippet: under section 56.29. Biel Reo, LLC, 156 So. 3d at 507–08. The court held that applying the statute of limitation
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-08-23
Snippet: See, e.g., Fitzpatrick v. State, 900 So. 2d 495, 507–08 (Fla. 2005); Thorp v. State, 777 So. 2d 385, 394
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-07
Snippet: Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Carlisle, 593 So. 2d 505, 507-08 (Fla. 1992). One major consideration applicable
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-08
Citation: 273 So. 3d 1117
Snippet: and any other relevant circumstances. Id. at 507-08. The record in this case would appear to
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-02-06
Citation: 268 So. 3d 821
Snippet: disposition hearing was required under section 39.507(8) if it found that the Father had abused, abandoned
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04
Citation: 262 So. 3d 127
Snippet: and should decide. See The Federalist No. 80, at 507-08 (Alexander Hamilton) (R. Scigliano ed. 2000) ("The
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-16
Citation: 257 So. 3d 640
Snippet: Procedure 3.850. See Gethers v. State, 838 So.2d 504, 507-08 (Fla. 2003) ; Johnson v. State, 932 So.2d 300,
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-03
Citation: 256 So. 3d 961
Snippet: FNMA. These factors supported intervention. Id. at 507-08. Although we do not agree that FNMA's motion to
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-03
Snippet: These factors supported intervention. Id. at 507-08. Although we do not agree that FNMA’s motion to
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-10
Citation: 261 So. 3d 607
Snippet: any other relevant circumstance." Id. at 507-08. This two-step analysis is a compromise among the
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-08
Citation: 252 So. 3d 278
Snippet: penalty is insufficient. See Odegaard, 137 So. 3d at 507-08. Notably, Mr. Filipkowski faced
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-06
Citation: 248 So. 3d 1246
Snippet: and any other relevant circumstances.” Id. at 507-08. 8
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-11-15
Citation: 230 So. 3d 601
Snippet: See Snowden v. Wells Fargo Bank, 172 So.3d 506, 507-08 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). Affirmed. LUCAS
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-09
Citation: 227 So. 3d 656, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1733
Snippet: cigarettes without collecting state taxes. Id. at 507-08, 111 S.Ct. 905. The tribe moved to dismiss the