Florida Statute 509.511 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 509
LODGING AND FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS; MEMBERSHIP CAMPGROUNDS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 509.511

509.511 Violation; Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.—A violation of this act is a deceptive and unfair trade practice and constitutes a violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

History.—s. 11, ch. 88-157.

F.S. 509.511 on Google Scholar

F.S. 509.511 on Casetext

Amendments to 509.511

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 509.511

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 509.511.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 509.511

Total Results: 20

VENICE HMA, LLC, D/B/A VENICE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC., ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 3 & 4 Prop. Owners Ass'n, 216 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)), fits snugly within that category

ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. v. SARASOTA COUNTY, VENICE HMA, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 3 & 4 Prop. Owners Ass'n, 216 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)), fits snugly within that category

Katina Paese v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-28T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: legal authority. See Williams v. State, 414 So. 2d 509, 511-12 (Fla. 1982) (While “counsel did not specifically

KIRKPATRICK TRUST, A FLORIDA LAND TRUST DATED JULY 1, 2021 v. LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC., DARCHEL HOUSTON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-01-12T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: their appearance.” J.G.G. v. M.S., 312 So. 3d 509, 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (alteration in original) (

LADONNA HUDKINS vs MATTHEW L. HUDKINS, GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND THE PROPERTY OF THE WARD, KEITH L. HUDKINS

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-04-28T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: DCA 2007)); see also J.G.G. v. M.S., 312 So. 3d 509, 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). “At its core, due process

JAVON LEE WALKER v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-10-20T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: nothing less. See J.G.G. v. M.S., 312 So. 3d 509, 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (“Procedural due process

LEVI WHITEHEAD v. SHUTTER HANGERS, INC., etc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-07-07T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: omitted); see also J.G.G. v. M.S., 312 So. 3d 509, 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (“Procedural due process

KELLY LOPEZ v. HIRAM FROMETA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-06-02T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: of due process. See Ferris v. Wynn, 242 So. 3d 509, 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (holding that emailed notice

ALEXANDER MARTINEZ-RIVERO v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: acquittal is improper.” State v. Williams, 742 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (citation omitted).

V.R.J., A MINOR v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-11-11T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: DCA 2001) (quoting Williams v. State, 414 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 1982)). The juvenile’s argument was

Kameron Holmes v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-08-23T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: acquittal is improper. State v. Williams, 742 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). When reviewing a court’s

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE v. TAMMY L. COOK

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-07-17T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 1994); see also Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 1972). And the appellate court will affirm

STATE OF FLORIDA v. SHERRY CROSSLEY-ROBINSON

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-06-05T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: shown remorse.’” Staffney v. State, 826 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (quoting § 921.0026(2)(j),

Luciani v. Nealon

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 181 So. 3d 1200, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18126, 2015 WL 7782819

Snippet: burden of proof.” Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla.1972) (quoting Rogge v. Weaver, 368 P.2d

Brian M. Rankin v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-16T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: . 5th DCA 2004); Staffney v. State, 826 So. 2d 509, 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)). “In the first step, the

Rankin v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 174 So. 3d 1092, 2015 WL 5438665

Snippet: Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Staffney v. State, 826 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)). “In the first step, the

State v. Lindsay

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 163 So. 3d 721, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6430, 2015 WL 1942890

Snippet: 5th DCA 2004)]; Staffney [v. State], 826 So.2d [509,] 511 [(Fla. 4th DCA 2002) ]. First, the court must

Guichard Jean-Baptiste v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-01-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 155 So. 3d 1237, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 2015 WL 340579

Snippet: evidence. See Staffney v. State, 826 So.2d 509, 511-12 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Therefore, on this basis

Mills v. Mills

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 140 So. 3d 1145, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9541, 2014 WL 2853779

Snippet: in the trial. See Tillman v. Baskin, 260 So.2d 509, 511 (Fla.1972) (holding that a trial judge cannot

McClamma v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-05-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 138 So. 3d 578, 2014 WL 1871510, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6939

Snippet: requirement); see also State v. Smith, 638 So.2d 509, 511-13 (Fla.1994) (Kogan, J., concurring) (discussing