Florida Statute 559.563 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 559
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, AND INVESTMENTS, GENERALLY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 559.563

559.563 Void registration.—Any registration made under this part based upon false identification or false information, or identification not current with respect to name, address, and business location, or other fact which is material to such registration, shall be void. Any registration made and subsequently void under this section shall not be construed as creating any defense in any action by the office to impose any sanction for any violation of this part.

History.—ss. 5, 13, ch. 93-275; s. 680, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 559.563 on Google Scholar

F.S. 559.563 on Casetext

Amendments to 559.563

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 559.563

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 559.563.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 559.563

Total Results: 20

Wellington Gilbert v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-06

Snippet: 2015)); see also Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563-64 (Fla. 2011) (noting that where there is no

Carissa Parker v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-10-30

Snippet: fundamental error. See Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011) (citing Jackson, 983 So. 2d at 574)

JEFFERY GESKE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-12

Snippet: arguments below. See Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011) ("[W]here there is no contemporaneous

State of Florida v. Tony Garcia

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-25

Snippet: review de novo. Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011). unlike this case, that one turned

BULK EXPRESS TRANSPORT INC. v. LUIS ALBERTO DIAZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-07-27

Snippet: claim. See Event Depot Corp. v. Frank, 269 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). Whether the respondents

L.S., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-06-08

Snippet: of due process.” Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011) (alteration in original) (quoting

Ronald Lee Coleman v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-09-14

Snippet: automatically preserved, Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011), but this case has nothing to do with

Onewest Bank v. Palmero

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-24

Snippet: (c) Fla. Const.; Taylor v. Maness, 941 So. 2d 559, 563-64 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (recognizing that, even

JOSHUA E WALLACE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-24

Citation: 257 So. 3d 1054

Snippet: reviewed de novo. Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011). “[A]n error that improperly extends

Hernandez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-16

Snippet: fundamental error. Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563-64 (Fla. 2011). Subparagraphs 921.1401(2)

Levar Jermaine Taborn Tyson v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-05

Citation: 228 So. 3d 652

Snippet: fundamental error. See Cromartie v. State, 70 So.3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011).1 I. At the sentencing hearing, Tyson

STATE OF FLORIDA v. AMANDA MARIE DAHL

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-09-27

Citation: 227 So. 3d 744

Snippet: review is de novo. Cromartie v. State, 70 So.3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011). As Appellee concedes, the trial

Abundant Living Citi Church, Inc. v. Abundant Living Ministries, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-08

Citation: 213 So. 3d 1055, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3104, 2017 WL 927813

Snippet: unpled is improper); Schrank v. Pearlman, 683 So.2d 559, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (observing that summary judgment

Dickie v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-08

Citation: 216 So. 3d 35, 2017 WL 913634, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3028

Snippet: 2002) (quoting Wasman v. United States, 468 U.S. 559, 563, 104 S.Ct. 3217, 82 L.Ed.2d 424 (1984)).

Charles v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-26

Citation: 204 So. 3d 63, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15940

Snippet: review is de novo. Cromartie v. State, 70 So.3d 559, 563 (Fla.2011). The Florida Supreme Court has recently

Futo Charles v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-31

Snippet: review is de novo. Cromartie v. State, 70 So. 3d 559, 563 (Fla. 2011). When sentencing a defendant within

Sidney Norvil, Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-28

Citation: 191 So. 3d 406, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 190, 2016 WL 1700529, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 886

Snippet: review is de novo. See Cromartie v. State, 70 So.3d 559, 563 (Fla.2011). Chapter 921, which includes the Criminal

Hampton v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-06

Citation: 178 So. 3d 921, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16713, 2015 WL 6757319

Snippet: was fundamental. Cromartie v. State, 70 So.3d 559, 563-64 (Fla.2011) (quoting Jackson v. State, 983 So

Mosley v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-06

Citation: 198 So. 3d 58, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16726, 2015 WL 6777209

Snippet: review. Cromartie v. State, 70 So.3d 559, 563 (Fla.2011); Imbert v. State, 154 So

Law v. Law

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-04-01

Citation: 163 So. 3d 553, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4698, 2015 WL 1449763

Snippet: 1983).”); Taylor v. Maness, 941 So.2d 559, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“[T]he individual claiming