Florida Statute 563.045 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO

Chapter 563
BEER AND MALT BEVERAGES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 563.045

563.045 Brands or labels to be registered; qualification to do business; fee; revocation.—

(1) No manufacturer, brewer, bottler, distributor, or importer of malt beverages, whether licensed under the beverage laws of this state or not, shall sell or offer for sale in this state, or move or cause to be moved within this state or into this state, any malt beverages, without first qualifying to do business in the state and registering its name and the brands or labels under which the malt beverages are to be sold or moved and furnishing such samples and information as to content, quality, and formula of such malt beverages as the division may require.

(2) The annual registration fee for a brand or label sold to a distributor is $30. No other annual registration fee for a brand or label is authorized under this section. Any registration may be suspended or revoked in the same manner as a beverage license for any violation of the Beverage Law.

(3) The purchase by any licensed wholesaler of any malt beverage from any manufacturer, brewer, bottler, distributor, or importer who has not complied with the provisions of subsection (1) is prohibited.

(4) The division shall promulgate rules to carry out the purpose of this section.

History.—s. 24, ch. 86-269; s. 1, ch. 2023-294.

F.S. 563.045 on Google Scholar

F.S. 563.045 on Casetext

Amendments to 563.045

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 563.045

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 563.045.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 563.045

Total Results: 13

Marco Technology Corp. v. Reynolds

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-02-03

Citation: 520 So. 2d 63, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 344, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 343, 1988 WL 6068

Snippet: In the earlier case of Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 So. 476 (1907), the Florida Supreme Court stated

American Nat. Bank v. INTERNATIONAL HARV. CR. CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-11-09

Citation: 269 So. 2d 726

Snippet: suit for foreclosure. Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 So. 476, 127 Am.St.Rep. 151; Marion Mortgage Co

American Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Illingworth

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-08-30

Citation: 213 So. 2d 747

Snippet: Limited v. Preston (1926) 115 Tex. 351, 282 S.W. 563, 45 A.L.R. 1016. *750 In the Commercial Union case

Tippins v. Belle Mead Dev. Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-10-17

Citation: 150 So. 719, 112 Fla. 372, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2244

Snippet: 350,61 Sou. Rep. 745; Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 Sou. Rep. 476, 127 Am. St. Rep. 151. The bill of

Neves v. Flannery

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-08-02

Citation: 149 So. 618, 111 Fla. 608

Snippet: In this connection, see Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 So.2d 476. In the Bank of South Jacksonville v

Rose v. Lurton Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-07-13

Citation: 149 So. 557, 111 Fla. 424

Snippet: suit for foreclosure. Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 Sou. Rep. 476, 127 Am. St. Rep. 151; Marion Mortgage

Richardson v. Myers

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-07-08

Citation: 143 So. 157, 106 Fla. 136

Snippet: clearly identify it." Davis et al. v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 So. 476. See also 11 C. J. 456. The description

Palatka Abstract & Title Guarantee Co. v. Haskell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-12-17

Citation: 131 So. 394, 100 Fla. 1504

Snippet: Fla. 559, 47 So. R. 936; Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 So. R. 476, 127 Am. St. Rep. 151; 5 R. C. L. 429;

Vanderpool Properties, Inc. v. Hess & Slager, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-10-18

Citation: 130 So. 457, 100 Fla. 933

Snippet: 617, 106 So. R. 422; Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 So. R. 476, 127 A. S. R. 151; Jones Chattel Mortgages

Spafford v. Brevard County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-08-11

Citation: 92 Fla. 617

Snippet: 98 South. Rep. 824; Peacock v. Feaster, 52 Fla. 563, 45 South. Rep. 1038. Section 29', ■ Article XYI of

Spafford v. Brevard County, Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1926-08-11

Citation: 110 So. 451, 92 Fla. 617, 1926 Fla. LEXIS 657

Snippet: 98 South. Rep. 824; Peacock v. Feaster,52 Fla. 563, 45 South. Rep. 1038. Section 29, Article XVI of the

Nat'l. Bank of Panama v. Nat'l. Bank of Chipley

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-11-23

Citation: 106 So. 422, 90 Fla. 617

Snippet: conveyed, it is sufficient. Divis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563,45 South. Rep. 476; Shomaker Co. v. Waters, 56 Fla

Farmers Union Warehouse Co. v. T. L. Wells & Bros.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1913-04-01

Citation: 65 Fla. 350, 61 So. 745

Snippet: evidence on that ground. Davis v. Horne, 54 Fla. 563, 45 South. Rep. 476. Of course the mortgage could have