Florida Statute 564.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIV
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO

Chapter 564
WINE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 564.03

564.03 Wines; sacramental and religious purposes.—

(1) For the purpose of this section the term “wine” is hereby defined to mean wine, vinous spirits, or vinous liquors.

(2) Any religious order, monastery, church or religious body, or any minister, pastor, priest, or rabbi thereof, may purchase wine for religious or sacramental purposes from any duly licensed wholesaler or retailer within the state, by obtaining a permit from the division for such purchases herein provided.

(3) The division shall issue said permit upon sworn application, stating the name of the applicant, the religious purpose for which the wine is to be used, the amount to be purchased, and from whom the purchase is to be made.

(4) The division for good cause may refuse to issue said permit.

(5) Said wine and the sale thereof, when sold as herein provided and used for religious or sacramental purposes, shall be exempt from all other restrictions, regulations, and taxation now provided by the laws of the state for the sale and distribution of wine.

History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ch. 20978, 1941; s. 7, ch. 29964, 1955; ss. 16, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 4, ch. 72-230; s. 29, ch. 79-11.

Note.—Former s. 562.49.

F.S. 564.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 564.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 564.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 564.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 564.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 564.03

Total Results: 19

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-12.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-12

Citation: 249 So. 3d 554

Snippet: of county) County, Florida. *564 3. (Defendant) intended to leave this

Ulloa v. CMI, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-07

Citation: 133 So. 3d 914, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 804, 2013 WL 5942299, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2420

Snippet: enactment. New York v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1, 9, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). The Uniform Law has now been

CMI, Inc. v. Landrum

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-18

Citation: 64 So. 3d 693, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8700, 2010 WL 2441026

Snippet: 06; New York v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1, 9, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). The Uniform Law has been adopted

Mastrapa v. South Florida Money Laundering Strike Force

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-04-26

Citation: 928 So. 2d 421, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5959, 2006 WL 1148642

Snippet: 1958), rev'd on other grounds, 359 U.S. 1, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). The order under review is a

Durkee v. Durkee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-06-29

Citation: 906 So. 2d 1176, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10104, 2005 WL 1523306

Snippet: state); New York v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959) (finding that Florida courts

Smith v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-04-09

Citation: 691 So. 2d 545, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3230, 1997 WL 163001

Snippet: So.2d 91 (Fla.1949); Nahmod v. Nelson, 147 Fla. 564, 3 So.2d 162 (1941). AFFIRMED. WARNER and FARMER,

Garrett v. Garrett

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-29

Citation: 668 So. 2d 991, 1996 WL 84244

Snippet: state); New York v. O'Neill, 359 U.S. 1, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959) (finding that Florida courts

Chicone v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-12-02

Citation: 658 So. 2d 1007, 1994 WL 669663

Snippet: the proper interpretation to be given section 817.564(3), Florida Statutes, which makes it unlawful for

Drain v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-05-29

Citation: 601 So. 2d 256, 1992 WL 111579

Snippet: charged the defendant with a violation of section 817.564(3), Florida Statutes, which makes it unlawful for

State v. Jones

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-23

Citation: 565 So. 2d 788, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5269, 1990 WL 102729

Snippet: him with violation of Florida Statute sec. 817.-564(3). ... Defendant is entitled to dismissal of this

General Motors Corp. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-04-11

Citation: 357 So. 2d 1045, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15793

Snippet: York v. O'Neil [O'Neill], 359 U.S. 1, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959); Reynolds v. Reynolds, 41 So

Greyhound Corporation v. Carswell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-01-05

Citation: 181 So. 2d 638

Snippet: appeal." [2] Fla.App., 1st Dist., 1962, 145 So.2d 564. [3] Fla., 1955, 80 So.2d 354. [4] Fla.App., 2nd

Moore v. Keen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-12-17

Citation: 181 So. 2d 29, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3607

Snippet: 47 So.2d 12 and Nahmod v. Nelson, 1941, 147 Fla. 564, 3 So.2d 162. We have carefully considered the record

Spencer Ladd's, Inc. v. Lehman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1964-10-06

Citation: 167 So. 2d 731

Snippet: 240; Ebersole v. Tepperman, (Fla. 1953) 65 So.2d 564. [3] Rule 1.38(a), Fla.Rules of Civil Procedure

Epstein v. New York

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-11-12

Citation: 157 So. 2d 705

Snippet: State of N. Y. v. O’Neill, 359 U.S. 1, 79 S.Ct. 564, 3 L.Ed.2d 585 (1959). They deal only with the question

Toney Builders, Inc. v. Huddleston

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-01-23

Citation: 149 So. 2d 38

Snippet: fact and law. Nahmod v. Nelson et ux., 147 Fla. 564, 3 So.2d 162. The petitioners first challenge the

Peters v. Thompson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1949-04-05

Citation: 42 So. 2d 91, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 962

Snippet: reported in State report; Nahmod v. Nelson, 147 Fla. 564, 3 So.2d 162. We are of the opinion that the position

Rhodes v. Edw. K. Tryon Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-06-18

Citation: 182 So. 301, 132 Fla. 880, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1847

Snippet: quoted from Greenleaf on Evidence, Vol. 1, page 564, 3 Ed., as follows: "An agent is a competent witness

Croom v. Noll

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1855-01-15

Citation: 6 Fla. 52

Snippet: able treatise on the Law of Evidence, vol. 1, page 564, 3 Ed., 1846, lays down the rule expressly, that “