Syfert Injury Law Firm

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases - Report No. 19-03

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-02-27

Snippet: claim been tried before you separately. [601.5] That is the law you must follow in deciding this

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases - Report No. 19-04

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-01-23

Snippet: - 34 - [601.5] That is the law you must follow in deciding this

Eduartez v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-13

Citation: 251 So. 3d 227

Snippet: 2016 order directing the clerk to disburse $32,601.05 of the surplus funds to Association's counsel ("the

Eduartez v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-13

Snippet: 2016 order directing the clerk to disburse $32,601.05 of the surplus funds to Association’s counsel

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases-Report No. 17-03.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-01

Citation: 236 So. 3d 919

Snippet: must disregard any different meaning. [601.5] That is the law you must follow in deciding this

In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES—REPORT NO. 13-01 (PRODUCTS LIABILITY)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-26

Citation: 160 So. 3d 869, 2015 WL 1400770

Snippet: each claim been tried before you separately. [601.5] That is the law you must follow in deciding this

In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business Cases

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-06-06

Citation: 116 So. 3d 284, 2013 WL 2435441

Snippet: against his employer) or claims under F.S. 768.0415. 601.5 CONCLUDING INSTRUCTION (BEFORE FINAL ARGUMENT) That

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Case—Report No. 12-01

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-05-30

Citation: 130 So. 3d 596, 2013 WL 2349287

Snippet: interpretation. You must disregard any different meaning. [601.5] That is the law you must follow in deciding this

In re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-05-23

Citation: 115 So. 3d 208, 2013 WL 2248678

Snippet: interpretation. You must disregard any different meaning. [601.5] That is the law you must follow in deciding this

Dickson v. Heaton

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-04-25

Citation: 87 So. 3d 81, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6493, 2012 WL 1414326

Snippet: entitlement to attorney’s fees only under subsection 608.601(5), Florida Statutes, which provides for fees to the

In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2010-01

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-10-21

Citation: 52 So. 3d 595, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 602, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1780, 2010 WL 4117070

Snippet: interpretation. You must disregard any different meaning. [601.5] That is the law you must follow in deciding this

In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Civil Cases—Report No. 09-01

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-04

Citation: 35 So. 3d 666, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 302

Snippet: Parties, Consolidated Cases 601.5 Concluding Instruction (Before

FM v. Dept. of Children & Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-02-20

Citation: 807 So. 2d 200, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1795, 2002 WL 237669

Snippet: Finally, although the mother claims that section 39.601(5) requires that services provide a path for reunification

Parsons v. Motor Homes of America

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-03-07

Citation: 465 So. 2d 1285, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 576

Snippet: — Section 672.716; (4) rejection — Section 672.601; (5) revocation of acceptance — Section 672.608; and

Hotel, Motel, Restaurant Emp. Loc. 737 v. Escambia Cty. Sch. Bd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-01-18

Citation: 426 So. 2d 1017

Snippet: when it is read in pari materia with Section 447.601,[[5]] Florida Statutes (1979). It seems clear from

Interest of Rlj

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-07-19

Citation: 336 So. 2d 132, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15203

Snippet: 1344, 43 L.Ed.2d 361 (1975). [22] 422 U.S. at 601-05, 95 S.Ct. at 2261-62, 45 L.Ed.2d at 427.

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1975-08-19

Snippet: and describes the composition thereof. Section 601.05, F.S., declares that the Department of Citrus "

State Department of Citrus v. Huff

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-02-08

Citation: 290 So. 2d 130, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7993

Snippet: corporation. *132Florida Statute § 601.05 F.S.A. reads as follows: “601.05 Department of Citrus a Body Corporate

General Telephone Company of Florida v. Carter

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-11-13

Citation: 115 So. 2d 554, 31 P.U.R.3d 497

Snippet: Public Utilities Commission, Fla. 1959, 108 So.2d 601. [5] Section 366.10, F.S.A. [6] De Groot v. Sheffield

The City of Hollywood v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-08-01

Citation: 19 So. 2d 111, 154 Fla. 785, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 818

Snippet: 93; Miller v. City and County of Denver, 89 Colo. 601. 5 P.2d 875; City of Phoenix v. Wilson, 39 Ariz. 250