Florida Statute 607.0102 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXVI
BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Chapter 607
FLORIDA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 607.0102

607.0102 Reservation of power to amend or repeal.—The Legislature has power to amend or repeal all or part of this chapter at any time, and all domestic and foreign corporations subject to this chapter shall be governed by the amendment or repeal.

History.—s. 2, ch. 89-154; s. 2, ch. 2019-90.

F.S. 607.0102 on Google Scholar

F.S. 607.0102 on Casetext

Amendments to 607.0102

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 607.0102

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 607.0102.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 607.0102

Total Results: 17

Alderwoods Group, Inc. v. Garcia

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 119 So. 3d 497, 2013 WL 3927691, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12002

Snippet: . v. Puerto Rico, ex rel. Barez, 458 U.S. 592, 607, 102 S.Ct. 3260, 73 L.Ed.2d 995 (1982)). To the extent

Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2006-12-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 945 So. 2d 1246

Snippet: . v. Puerto Rico, ex rel. Barez, 458 U.S. 592, 607, 102 S.Ct. 3260, 3268, 73 L.Ed.2d 995 (1982). "

Lena v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-04-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 901 So. 2d 227

Snippet: tailored to serve that interest." 457 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. at 2620. The appropriate analysis to follow

Robbins v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-12-22T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 891 So. 2d 1102

Snippet: embodied in the Miranda warnings...." Id. at 607, 102 S.Ct. 1309. Nevertheless, the impeachment testimony

Alonso v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-07-17T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 821 So. 2d 423

Snippet: tailored to serve that interest." 457 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. at 2620. The appropriate analysis to follow

Clements v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-07-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 742 So. 2d 338

Snippet: tailored to serve that interest." 457 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. at 2620. The appropriate analysis to follow… tailored to serve that interest." Id. at 607, 102 S.Ct. 2613 (citations omitted). Two years later

Williams v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-04-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 736 So. 2d 699

Snippet: tailored to serve that interest." 457 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. at 2620. The appropriate analysis to follow

State v. Hoggins

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1998-09-17T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 718 So. 2d 761

Snippet: 65 L.Ed.2d 86; see also Fletcher, 455 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. 1309, 71 L.Ed.2d 490. Specifically, the …criminal defendant's own testimony. Id. at 607, 102 S.Ct. 1309, 71 L.Ed.2d 490. This Court has traditionally

Hoggins v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-02-25T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 689 So. 2d 383

Snippet: 240-41, 100 S.Ct. at 2130-31; Weir, 455 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. at 1312. Many states have used their own

State v. Globe Communications Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-08-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 622 So. 2d 1066

Snippet: encourage such victims to come forward. 457 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. at 2620. The Court found that, not only

Schmitt v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1991-11-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 590 So. 2d 404

Snippet: Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 607, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 2620, 73 L.Ed.2d 248 (1982). I believe

Hopkins v. Vizcayans

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-06-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 582 So. 2d 689, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5990, 1991 WL 113114

Snippet: 166, Laws of Florida, and replaced with section 607.0102, Florida Statutes (1989). . Section 607.007,

Pritchett v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-07-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 566 So. 2d 6

Snippet: tailored to serve that interest." 457 U.S. at 607, 102 S.Ct. at 2620. The appropriate analysis to follow

Miami Coliseum Corp. v. Gallup

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-09-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 915

Snippet: Buford, Whitfield, Davis 14 September 1931 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 915 Peters Kemp, for Appellant; Van

Holland v. Barnhart

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-09-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 921

Snippet: Buford, Whitfield, Davis 14 September 1931 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 921 W. W. Whitehurst, for Appellants;

Tomasello, Jr. Etc. v. Nisbet

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-08-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 826

Snippet: Buford, Whitfield, Davis 7 August 1931 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 826 John D. Shepard, for Appellant; James

Smith v. Gruner

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1931-08-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 828

Snippet: Buford, Whitfield, Davis 7 August 1931 136 So. 607, 102 Fla. 828 George W. Coleman and Coleman Cook