Florida Statute 704.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY

Chapter 704
EASEMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 704.08

704.08 Cemeteries; right of ingress and egress for visiting or maintenance.—The relatives and descendants of any person buried in a cemetery shall have an easement for ingress and egress for the purpose of visiting the cemetery at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner. The owner of the land may designate the easement. If the cemetery is abandoned or otherwise not being maintained, such relatives and descendants may request the owner to provide for reasonable maintenance of the cemetery, and, if the owner refuses or fails to maintain the cemetery, the relatives and descendants shall have the right to maintain the cemetery.

History.—s. 36, ch. 80-238.

F.S. 704.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 704.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 704.08

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 704.08

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 704.08.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 704.08

Total Results: 19

MARTIN J. ZARCADOOLAS v. GREGORY TONY, as Sheriff of Broward County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-01-04

Snippet: property. See §§ 932.703(3)(a), (3)(c), (7)(a), .704(8), Fla. Stat. (2020); see also Gomez v. Vill. of

MICHAEL HUDSON v. CITY OF SUNRISE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-14

Citation: 237 So. 3d 1031

Snippet: in violation” of the Forfeiture Act. § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (2002). 2 The person contesting

David Gee, Sheriff of Hillsborough County v. Grantland

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-09

Citation: 203 So. 3d 992

Snippet: in violation of the ... Forfeiture Act.” § 932.704(8); see also Gomez, 41 So.3d at 184.

Ezra Mostowicz v. Scott J. Israel, Sheriff of Broward County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-07-23

Citation: 142 So. 3d 976, 2014 WL 3605527, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11185

Snippet: forfeiture by clear and convincing evidence. See § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. At the hearing on Mostowicz’s motion

Village Carver Phase 1, LLC v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-09-30

Citation: 128 So. 3d 107, 2013 WL 5429585, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15394

Snippet: for the purpose of visiting the cemetery.” See § 704.08, Fla. Stat. (2008).1 We disagree. Analysis The

Gonzalez v. City of Tampa

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-02-01

Citation: 106 So. 3d 47, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1545

Snippet: at 186. If so, the property is forfeited. § 932.704(8). The specific statute at issue here, section 932

Gomez v. Village of Pinecrest

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-08

Citation: 41 So. 3d 180, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 432, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1116, 2010 WL 2680276

Snippet: Act." Velez, 934 So.2d at *185 1164 (citing § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (2002)). Moreover, after amendments

Seawell v. HARGARTEN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-02-10

Citation: 28 So. 3d 152, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1378, 2010 WL 445624

Snippet: have only been a balance owed to the Wife of $1,704.08. According to the Husband, before he sent the authorization

Velez v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY POLICE DEPT.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-06-22

Citation: 934 So. 2d 1162, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 641, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 1341, 2006 WL 1699468

Snippet: used in violation" of the Forfeiture Act. § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (2002). The person contesting the forfeiture

Wagner v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-02-04

Citation: 895 So. 2d 453, 2005 WL 263770

Snippet: Stat. (Supp.1998); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704. [8] See State v. Coban, 520 So.2d 40 (Fla.1988) (recognizing

Gonzalez v. City of Homestead

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-09-18

Citation: 825 So. 2d 1050, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13430, 2002 WL 31059555

Snippet: activity. See §§ 932.701(2)(a), 932.703(1), (6), 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (2001). In this case Gonzalez filed

Butler v. CITY OF MELBOURNE POLICE DEPT.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-03-28

Citation: 812 So. 2d 547, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4085, 2002 WL 463404

Snippet: City of Melbourne Police Department. See § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (1995). Butler's later appeal of the

Williams v. Henderson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-10-13

Citation: 779 So. 2d 450, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13279

Snippet: standard is clear and convincing evidence. See § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (1997). However, the trial court in

H & F Land v. Panama City-Bay Co. Airport

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-10

Citation: 736 So. 2d 1167, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 264, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1047

Snippet: Stat. (1995). [11] We recognize that section 704.08, Florida Statutes (1995), allows an easement for

State v. Sobieck

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-09-26

Citation: 701 So. 2d 96, 1997 WL 593912

Snippet: of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. § 932.704(8), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). These provisions satisfy

State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicle v. McCluster

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-01-17

Citation: 668 So. 2d 1000, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 218

Snippet: to do this, the claimant may prevail. See §§ 932.704(8)-(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993). The claimant, however

Mallock v. Southern Memorial Park, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-04-17

Citation: 561 So. 2d 330, 1990 WL 45515

Snippet: the statutory right of access pursuant to section 704.08, Florida Statutes (1987). The Mallocks alleged

In re Rules of Probate & Guardianship Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-12-23

Citation: 517 So. 2d 675, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 10, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2677, 1987 WL 29333

Snippet: guardian is specifically outlined in section 744.704(8), the proposal is rejected as unnecessary. 8. Rule

Florida Bar

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-06-16

Citation: 334 So. 2d 23, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4362

Snippet: against Respondent for costs in the amount of $1,704.08. It is so ordered. OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS