Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC., 880 F.3d 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

. . . This practice is permitted, Janssen argues, by MPEP § 714.01(e), which specifically allows references . . .

BAHIAKINA, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,, 102 F. Supp. 3d 369 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . This sum was later increased to $714.01 in an execution on money judgment that was issued on December . . .

FLEMING v. HANSCOM, 162 F.2d 164 (9th Cir. 1947)

. . . The result-ting overcharges amounted to $714.01. This action was commenced on January 22, 1946. . . . however, was not a defense, but served only to reduce the damages to the amount of the overcharges ($714.01 . . . pending in the court below, the parties stipulated that “the alleged overcharges, if any, amount to $714.01 . . . overcharges * * * plaintiff [Administrator Porter] shall ask for judgment in the sum not to exceed $714.01 . . .

MAGNOLIA PETROLEUM CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 63 Ct. Cl. 173 (Ct. Cl. 1927)

. . . On $82,853. 32 from March 20, 1921 (six months after the claim was filed), to October 11, 1923_ 12, 714.01 . . .