Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 717.115 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 717.115 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 717.115

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XL
REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY
Chapter 717
DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 717.115
717.115 Wages.Unpaid wages, including wages represented by unpresented payroll checks, owing in the ordinary course of the holder’s business that have not been claimed by the owner for more than 1 year after becoming payable are presumed unclaimed.
History.s. 16, ch. 87-105; s. 15, ch. 2001-36.

F.S. 717.115 on Google Scholar

F.S. 717.115 on Casetext

Amendments to 717.115


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 717.115
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 717.115.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 717.115

Total Results: 12

Choice Plus, LLC v. Department of Financial Services, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-17

Citation: 244 So. 3d 343

Snippet: after a period of inaction for five years); § 717.115, Fla. Stat. (2013) (unpaid wages that have not

MacArthur v. North Palm Beach Utilities, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-07-26

Citation: 202 So. 2d 181, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3390

Snippet: the rule announced in Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 828: "* * * No contemporaneous understanding

Clark v. Howard

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-11-29

Citation: 192 So. 2d 302, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4622

Snippet: 192 So. 392 (1939); Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 828 (1927); Walls v. Endel, 20 Fla. 86 (1883)

Blackwelder v. D'Ercole Enterprises, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-01-22

Citation: 148 So. 2d 721

Snippet: 787, 108 So. 211; Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 828; McKinney v. Gainey, 96 Fla. 547, 118

McLendon v. Davis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-06-19

Citation: 131 So. 2d 765

Snippet: Connor v. Connor, supra; Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 828; Marcus v. Hull, 142 Fla. 306, 195 So

Markell v. Hilpert

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-12-05

Citation: 192 So. 392, 140 Fla. 842, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1213

Snippet: as a mortgage. See Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 828; McKinney v. Gainey, 96 Fla. 547, 118

Marcus v. Hull

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-05-09

Citation: 195 So. 170, 142 Fla. 306, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 2054

Snippet: Fla. 304, 68 So. 658; Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 828. Thus, it only becomes necessary for us

Brumick v. Morris

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1938-01-08

Citation: 178 So. 564, 131 Fla. 46

Snippet: be considered." See Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717,115 Sou. Rep. 828. In Holmberg v. Hardee, 90 Fla. 787

Raulerson Ex Rel. Rush v. Green

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-04-24

Citation: 167 So. 825, 124 Fla. 181, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1082

Snippet: G.L. See Stovall v. *Page 187 Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 828; Smith v. State Life Ins. Co.,96 Fla.

Gross v. Hammond

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-03-25

Citation: 167 So. 373, 123 Fla. 471

Snippet: 933, 130 So. 457. In Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 So. 282, we said: "A deed absolute on its face

The Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1935-12-19

Citation: 169 So. 750, 125 Fla. 199, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1673

Snippet: due process of law. Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717, 115 Sou. Rep. 828; Quinn Plumbing Co., Inc., v. New

Robbins v. Blanc Et Ux.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-06-04

Citation: 142 So. 223, 105 Fla. 625

Snippet: due process of law. Stovall v. Stokes, 94 Fla. 717,115 Sou. Rep. 828; Quinn Plumbing Co., Inc. v. New