Florida Statute 766.207 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLV
TORTS

Chapter 766
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND RELATED MATTERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 766.207

766.207 Voluntary binding arbitration of medical negligence claims.—

(1) Voluntary binding arbitration pursuant to this section and ss. 766.208-766.212 shall not apply to rights of action involving the state or its agencies or subdivisions, or the officers, employees, or agents thereof, pursuant to s. 768.28.

(2) Upon the completion of presuit investigation with preliminary reasonable grounds for a medical negligence claim intact, the parties may elect to have damages determined by an arbitration panel. Such election may be initiated by either party by serving a request for voluntary binding arbitration of damages within 90 days after service of the claimant’s notice of intent to initiate litigation upon the defendant. The evidentiary standards for voluntary binding arbitration of medical negligence claims shall be as provided in ss. 120.569(2)(g) and 120.57(1)(c).

(3) Upon receipt of a party’s request for such arbitration, the opposing party may accept the offer of voluntary binding arbitration within 30 days. However, in no event shall the defendant be required to respond to the request for arbitration sooner than 90 days after service of the notice of intent to initiate litigation under s. 766.106. Such acceptance within the time period provided by this subsection shall be a binding commitment to comply with the decision of the arbitration panel. The liability of any insurer shall be subject to any applicable insurance policy limits.

(4) The arbitration panel shall be composed of three arbitrators, one selected by the claimant, one selected by the defendant, and one an administrative law judge furnished by the Division of Administrative Hearings who shall serve as the chief arbitrator. In the event of multiple plaintiffs or multiple defendants, the arbitrator selected by the side with multiple parties shall be the choice of those parties. If the multiple parties cannot reach agreement as to their arbitrator, each of the multiple parties shall submit a nominee, and the director of the Division of Administrative Hearings shall appoint the arbitrator from among such nominees.

(5) The arbitrators shall be independent of all parties, witnesses, and legal counsel, and no officer, director, affiliate, subsidiary, or employee of a party, witness, or legal counsel may serve as an arbitrator in the proceeding.

(6) The rate of compensation for medical negligence claims arbitrators other than the administrative law judge shall be set by the chief judge of the appropriate circuit court by schedule providing for compensation of not less than $250 per day nor more than $750 per day or as agreed by the parties. In setting the schedule, the chief judge shall consider the prevailing rates charged for the delivery of professional services in the community.

(7) Arbitration pursuant to this section shall preclude recourse to any other remedy by the claimant against any participating defendant, and shall be undertaken with the understanding that damages shall be awarded as provided by general law, including the Wrongful Death Act, subject to the following limitations:

(a) Net economic damages shall be awardable, including, but not limited to, past and future medical expenses and 80 percent of wage loss and loss of earning capacity, offset by any collateral source payments.

(b) Noneconomic damages shall be limited to a maximum of $250,000 per incident, and shall be calculated on a percentage basis with respect to capacity to enjoy life, so that a finding that the claimant’s injuries resulted in a 50-percent reduction in his or her capacity to enjoy life would warrant an award of not more than $125,000 noneconomic damages.

(c) Damages for future economic losses shall be awarded to be paid by periodic payments pursuant to s. 766.202(9) and shall be offset by future collateral source payments.

(d) Punitive damages shall not be awarded.

(e) The defendant shall be responsible for the payment of interest on all accrued damages with respect to which interest would be awarded at trial.

(f) The defendant shall pay the claimant’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, as determined by the arbitration panel, but in no event more than 15 percent of the award, reduced to present value.

(g) The defendant shall pay all the costs of the arbitration proceeding and the fees of all the arbitrators other than the administrative law judge.

(h) Each defendant who submits to arbitration under this section shall be jointly and severally liable for all damages assessed pursuant to this section.

(i) The defendant’s obligation to pay the claimant’s damages shall be for the purpose of arbitration under this section only. A defendant’s or claimant’s offer to arbitrate shall not be used in evidence or in argument during any subsequent litigation of the claim following the rejection thereof.

(j) The fact of making or accepting an offer to arbitrate shall not be admissible as evidence of liability in any collateral or subsequent proceeding on the claim.

(k) Any offer by a claimant to arbitrate must be made to each defendant against whom the claimant has made a claim. Any offer by a defendant to arbitrate must be made to each claimant who has joined in the notice of intent to initiate litigation, as provided in s. 766.106. A defendant who rejects a claimant’s offer to arbitrate shall be subject to the provisions of s. 766.209(3). A claimant who rejects a defendant’s offer to arbitrate shall be subject to the provisions of s. 766.209(4).

(l) The hearing shall be conducted by all of the arbitrators, but a majority may determine any question of fact and render a final decision. The chief arbitrator shall decide all evidentiary matters.

The provisions of this subsection shall not preclude settlement at any time by mutual agreement of the parties.

(8) Any issue between the defendant and the defendant’s insurer or self-insurer as to who shall control the defense of the claim and any responsibility for payment of an arbitration award, shall be determined under existing principles of law; provided that the insurer or self-insurer shall not offer to arbitrate or accept a claimant’s offer to arbitrate without the written consent of the defendant.

(9) The Division of Administrative Hearings is authorized to promulgate rules to effect the orderly and efficient processing of the arbitration procedures of ss. 766.201-766.212.

(10) Rules promulgated by the Division of Administrative Hearings pursuant to this section, s. 120.54, or s. 120.65 may authorize any reasonable sanctions except contempt for violation of the rules of the division or failure to comply with a reasonable order issued by an administrative law judge, which is not under judicial review.

History.—s. 54, ch. 88-1; s. 30, ch. 88-277; s. 36, ch. 91-110; s. 114, ch. 92-33; s. 4, ch. 92-278; s. 2, ch. 94-161; s. 304, ch. 96-410; s. 1801, ch. 97-102; s. 89, ch. 99-3; s. 62, ch. 2003-416.

F.S. 766.207 on Google Scholar

F.S. 766.207 on Casetext

Amendments to 766.207

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 766.207

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 766.207.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 766.207

Total Results: 20

North Shore Medical Center v. Clara Navarro, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Mauricio Polifroni

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-10

Snippet: medical malpractice arbitration proceeding. § 766.207, Fla. Stat. An arbitration award under this section

Piero Palacios v. Sharnice Lawson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: requested voluntary binding arbitration under section 766.207, Florida Statutes (2020). The defendant ultimately

HEALTHCARE UNDERWRITERS GROUP, INC., AMARNATH VEDERE, M.D. and CARDIOLOGY PARTNERS, P.L. v. DEBORAH SANFORD, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF GERALD L. SANFORD

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-03-30

Snippet: § 766.201(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020). Section 766.207(7)(k) provides that “[a] defendant who rejects

PLANTATION GENERAL HOSPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. DIVISION OF ADMIN. HEARINGS, BERNARD BELZI, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-04

Citation: 243 So. 3d 985

Snippet: voluntary binding arbitration pursuant to section 766.207, Florida Statutes (2014) et seq., to determine

Allstate Insurance Company v. Orthopedic Specialists, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-26

Citation: 212 So. 3d 973, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 38, 2017 WL 372092, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 194

Snippet: (“Arbitration is not voluntary according to section 766.207(7)(k) because ‘a claimant who rejects a defendant’s

Eileen Hernandez, M.D. v. Lualhati Crespo

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-12-22

Citation: 211 So. 3d 19, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 625, 2016 WL 7406537, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2718

Snippet: to arbitrate under Florida Statutes, 766.106 or 766.207, the parties and/or claimant(s) shall resolve any

Meridian Pain & Diagnostics, Inc. v. Greber

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-27

Citation: 197 So. 3d 153, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11380, 2016 WL 4035874

Snippet: be an arbitration conducted pursuant to section 766.207 of the Florida Statutes. Petitioners’ counsel’s

Mohamad R. Samiian, M.D., individually etc. v. First Professionals Insurance etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-01

Citation: 180 So. 3d 190, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17927

Snippet: offer binding arbitration pursuant to section 766.207, Florida Statutes (2003). Attached to the email

Santiago v. Baker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-04-11

Citation: 135 So. 3d 569, 2014 WL 1396594, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5358

Snippet: they never invoked the protections of section 766.207, which provides, in part, as follows: (2) Upon

Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-03-13

Citation: 134 So. 3d 894, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 104, 2014 WL 959180, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 933

Snippet: agreed to arbitrate. Id. at 193 (describing section 766.207(7), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1988)). They also capped noneconomic

Franks v. Bowers

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-06-20

Citation: 116 So. 3d 1240, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 416, 2013 WL 3064807, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1222

Snippet: subject to limitations on recoverable damages. See § 766.207, Fla. Stat. (2008). In turn, the Legislature envisioned

Samples v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-05-16

Citation: 114 So. 3d 912, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 317, 2013 WL 2096260, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1001

Snippet: 769 So.2d at 967 (emphasis omitted) (quoting § 766.207(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997)). Having determined that

Estrada v. Mercy Hospital, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-10

Citation: 121 So. 3d 51, 2013 WL 1442251, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5665

Snippet: appeal concerns the interpretation of section 766.207(7)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), which provides

Franks v. Bowers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-16

Citation: 62 So. 3d 16, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3493, 2011 WL 891941

Snippet: proceeds to trial. See §§ 766.106(3)(b)(3); 766.207(2); 766.207(7); 766.118(2), Fla. Stat. The arbitration

Deno v. Lifemark Hospital of Florida, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-10-13

Citation: 45 So. 3d 959, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15568, 2010 WL 3984806

Snippet: case. The question is how to interpret section 766.207, Florida Statutes (2008), which provides for voluntary

Samples v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-06-18

Citation: 40 So. 3d 18, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8763, 2010 WL 2425998

Snippet: $250,000 per incident in violation of section 766.207(7)(b), Florida Statutes. Id. at 963. The district

Parham v. FLORIDA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-31

Citation: 35 So. 3d 920, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4183, 2010 WL 1222925

Snippet: interplay between section 766.209 and section 766.207. Section 766.207 establishes voluntary binding arbitration

Lifemark Hospitals of Florida, Inc. v. Afonso

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-03-11

Citation: 4 So. 3d 764, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1944, 2009 WL 605342

Snippet: statutory construction, namely, whether section 766.207(7), Florida Statutes (2003), limits awardable economic

Gottlieb v. Samiian

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-12-05

Citation: 999 So. 2d 678, 2008 WL 5101153

Snippet: binding arbitration proceeding pursuant to section 766.207, Florida Statutes (2003). See Samiian v. Gottlieb

JONATHAN M. FRANTZ, MD, PA v. Shedden

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-02-22

Citation: 974 So. 2d 1193, 2008 WL 465543

Snippet: Agreement essentially track the provisions of section 766.207, Florida Statutes (2004), which governs voluntary