Notes of Decisions
Cited in
66
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case:
Jordan v. State, 728 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Jordan v. State, 728 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
· cites it 18× “The defendant correctly points out that the information did not charge him with a violation of section 775.0823, Florida Statutes. Defendant argues that since section 775.”
Thompson v. State, 695 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1997).
· cites it 7× “07(3), Florida Statutes (1993), and reenacted this statute as section 775.0823, Florida Statutes (1995).”
San Martin v. State, 717 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1998).
· cites it 4× “See § 775.0823(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). Because the jury's guilt-phase verdict specifically found that Steven Bauer was a law enforcement officer, there were two possible jury sentencing recomendations: death or life imprisonment without possibility of parole.”
Matthews v. State, 774 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
· cites it 11× “Mathews, appeals his judgment and sentence for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer. [1] Mr.”
Ramroop v. State, 174 So. 3d 584 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
· cites it 10× “§ 775.0823, Fla. Stat. (1995). Specifically, in 1995, the Legislature added the crime of attempt for all murder offenses listed in the prior version (i.”
Fernandez v. State, 730 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1999).
· cites it 2× “See § 775.0823(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). The jury's guilt-phase verdict specifically found that Steven Bauer was a law enforcement officer.”
Kenon v. State, 780 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
· cites it 5× “Regarding the second issue, Kenon argues that pursuant to section 775.0823, Florida Statutes (1997), he must receive a guideline sentence for the offense of attempted first-degree murder of a law enforcement officer.”
Darst v. State, 816 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
· cites it 7× “; Fla. Stat. § 775.0823 (10). Furthermore, penalty enhancement statutes such as this are used to prepare the sentencing scoresheet to sentence the defendant; they are not used by the jury or finder of fact to determine guilt.”
Wheeler v. State, 124 So. 3d 865 (Fla. 2013).
· cites it 2× “§ 775.0823, Fla. Stat. (2005). Moreover, even in Burgos, 865 So.”
Madrigal v. State, 683 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
· cites it 3× “703(d)(22), which provides for such enhancement for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer, is applicable only to offenses committed on or after October 1, 1995, and appellant's offense was committed on March 27, 1995.”
Stand. Jury Instructions in Crim. Cases—No. 96-1, 690 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 1997).
· cites it 4× “” See F.S. 775.0823. *1264 We commend the Committee for its diligence and thoroughness, and we authorize the publication and use of these instructions.”
775.0823(1): 4 cases
San Martin v. State, 717 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1998).
“See § 775.0823(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). Because the jury's guilt-phase verdict specifically found that Steven Bauer was a law enforcement officer, there were two possible jury sentencing recomendations: death or life imprisonment without possibility of parole.”
Fernandez v. State, 730 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1999).
“See § 775.0823(1), Fla. Stat. (1991). The jury's guilt-phase verdict specifically found that Steven Bauer was a law enforcement officer.”
775.0823(10): 6 cases
Madrigal v. State, 683 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
“703(d)(22), which provides for such enhancement for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer, is applicable only to offenses committed on or after October 1, 1995, and appellant's offense was committed on March 27, 1995.”
Darst v. State, 816 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
“; Fla. Stat. § 775.0823 (10). Furthermore, penalty enhancement statutes such as this are used to prepare the sentencing scoresheet to sentence the defendant; they are not used by the jury or finder of fact to determine guilt.”
775.0823(2): 8 cases
Kenon v. State, 780 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
“Regarding the second issue, Kenon argues that pursuant to section 775.0823, Florida Statutes (1997), he must receive a guideline sentence for the offense of attempted first-degree murder of a law enforcement officer.”
775.0823(3): 6 cases
Jordan v. State, 728 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
“The defendant correctly points out that the information did not charge him with a violation of section 775.0823, Florida Statutes. Defendant argues that since section 775.”
775.0823(4): 2 cases
Jordan v. State, 728 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
“The defendant correctly points out that the information did not charge him with a violation of section 775.0823, Florida Statutes. Defendant argues that since section 775.”
775.0823(5): 5 cases
775.0823(6): 1 case
775.0823(7): 3 cases
775.0823(9): 8 cases
Darst v. State, 816 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).
“; Fla. Stat. § 775.0823 (10). Furthermore, penalty enhancement statutes such as this are used to prepare the sentencing scoresheet to sentence the defendant; they are not used by the jury or finder of fact to determine guilt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.