Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 907 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 907 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 907

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 907
PROCEDURE AFTER ARREST
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 907
CHAPTER 907
PROCEDURE AFTER ARREST
907.04 Disposition of defendant upon arrest.
907.041 Pretrial detention and release.
907.043 Pretrial release; citizens’ right to know.
907.044 Annual study of pretrial release program effectiveness and cost efficiency.
907.045 Habeas corpus; motion to dismiss; preliminary hearing.
907.04 Disposition of defendant upon arrest.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), if a person who is arrested does not have a right to bail for the offense charged, he or she shall be delivered immediately into the custody of the sheriff of the county in which the indictment, information, or affidavit is filed. If the person who is arrested has a right to bail, he or she shall be released after giving bond on the amount specified in the warrant.
(2) If the person who is arrested is, at the time of arrest, in the custody of the Department of Corrections under sentence of imprisonment, unless otherwise ordered by the court, such person shall remain in the department’s custody pending disposition of the charge or until the person’s underlying sentence of imprisonment expires, whichever occurs earlier. If the arrested state prisoner’s presence is required in court for any reason, the provisions of s. 944.17(8) shall apply.
History.s. 133a, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(139); s. 67, ch. 70-339; s. 1508, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 2006-99.
907.041 Pretrial detention and release.
(1) LEGISLATIVE INTENT.It is the policy of this state that persons committing serious criminal offenses, posing a threat to the safety of the community or the integrity of the judicial process, or failing to appear at trial be detained upon arrest. However, persons found to meet specified criteria shall be released under certain conditions until proceedings are concluded and adjudication has been determined. The Legislature finds that this policy of pretrial detention and release will assure the detention of those persons posing a threat to society while reducing the costs for incarceration by releasing, until trial, those persons not considered a danger to the community who meet certain criteria. It is the intent of the Legislature that the primary consideration be the protection of the community from risk of physical harm to persons.
(2) RULES OF PROCEDURE.Procedures for pretrial release determinations shall be governed by rules adopted by the Supreme Court.
(3) RELEASE ON NONMONETARY CONDITIONS.
(a) It is the intent of the Legislature to create a presumption in favor of release on nonmonetary conditions for any person who is granted pretrial release unless such person is charged with a dangerous crime as defined in subsection (5). Such person shall be released on monetary conditions if it is determined that such monetary conditions are necessary to assure the presence of the person at trial or at other proceedings, to protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons, to assure the presence of the accused at trial, or to assure the integrity of the judicial process.
(b) No person shall be released on nonmonetary conditions under the supervision of a pretrial release service, unless the service certifies to the court that it has investigated or otherwise verified:
1. The circumstances of the accused’s family, employment, financial resources, character, mental condition, and length of residence in the community;
2. The accused’s record of convictions, of appearances at court proceedings, of flight to avoid prosecution, or of failure to appear at court proceedings; and
3. Other facts necessary to assist the court in its determination of the indigency of the accused and whether she or he should be released under the supervision of the service.
(4) SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR CERTAIN OFFENSES INVOLVING SCHOOLS OR STUDENTS.
(a) As used in this subsection, the term “school” means the grounds or facility of any early learning, prekindergarten, kindergarten, elementary school, middle school, junior high school, secondary school, career center, or postsecondary school, whether public or private.
(b) When a person is charged with a crime under s. 790.115, s. 790.161, s. 790.1615, s. 790.162, s. 790.163, s. 790.164, s. 790.165, s. 790.166, s. 810.095, or s. 836.10, alleged to have been committed at or against a school or against a student while he or she is at school, the court must consider whether conditions of electronic monitoring and a prohibition from being within 1,000 feet of any school are appropriate to protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons.
(5) PRETRIAL DETENTION.
(a) As used in this subsection, “dangerous crime” means any of the following:
1. Arson;
2. Aggravated assault;
3. Aggravated battery;
4. Illegal use of explosives;
5. Child abuse or aggravated child abuse;
6. Abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult, or aggravated abuse of an elderly person or disabled adult;
7. Aircraft piracy;
8. Kidnapping;
9. Homicide;
10. Manslaughter, including DUI manslaughter and BUI manslaughter;
11. Sexual battery;
12. Robbery;
13. Carjacking;
14. Lewd, lascivious, or indecent assault or act upon or in presence of a child under the age of 16 years;
15. Sexual activity with a child, who is 12 years of age or older but less than 18 years of age, by or at solicitation of person in familial or custodial authority;
16. Burglary of a dwelling;
17. Stalking and aggravated stalking;
18. Act of domestic violence as defined in s. 741.28;
19. Home invasion robbery;
20. Act of terrorism as defined in s. 775.30;
21. Manufacturing any substances in violation of chapter 893;
22. Attempting or conspiring to commit any such crime;
23. Human trafficking;
24. Trafficking in any controlled substance described in s. 893.135(1)(c)4.;
25. Extortion in violation of s. 836.05; and
26. Written threats to kill in violation of s. 836.10.
(b) A person arrested for a dangerous crime may not be granted nonmonetary pretrial release at a first appearance hearing if the court has determined there is probable cause to believe the person has committed the offense.
(c) Upon motion by the state attorney, the court may order pretrial detention if it finds a substantial probability, based on a defendant’s past and present patterns of behavior, the criteria in s. 903.046, and any other relevant facts, that any of the following circumstances exist:
1. The defendant has previously violated conditions of release and that no further conditions of release are reasonably likely to assure the defendant’s appearance at subsequent proceedings;
2. The defendant, with the intent to obstruct the judicial process, has threatened, intimidated, or injured any victim, potential witness, juror, or judicial officer, or has attempted or conspired to do so, and that no condition of release will reasonably prevent the obstruction of the judicial process;
3. The defendant is charged with trafficking in controlled substances as defined by s. 893.135, that there is a substantial probability that the defendant has committed the offense, and that no conditions of release will reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at subsequent criminal proceedings;
4. The defendant is charged with DUI manslaughter, as defined by s. 316.193, and that there is a substantial probability that the defendant committed the crime and that the defendant poses a threat of harm to the community; conditions that would support a finding by the court pursuant to this subparagraph that the defendant poses a threat of harm to the community include, but are not limited to, any of the following:
a. The defendant has previously been convicted of any crime under s. 316.193, or of any crime in any other state or territory of the United States that is substantially similar to any crime under s. 316.193;
b. The defendant was driving with a suspended driver license when the charged crime was committed; or
c. The defendant has previously been found guilty of, or has had adjudication of guilt withheld for, driving while the defendant’s driver license was suspended or revoked in violation of s. 322.34;
5. The defendant poses the threat of harm to the community. The court may so conclude, if it finds that the defendant is presently charged with a dangerous crime, that there is a substantial probability that the defendant committed such crime, that the factual circumstances of the crime indicate a disregard for the safety of the community, and that there are no conditions of release reasonably sufficient to protect the community from the risk of physical harm to persons;
6. The defendant was on probation, parole, or other release pending completion of sentence or on pretrial release for a dangerous crime at the time the current offense was committed;
7. The defendant has violated one or more conditions of pretrial release or bond for the offense currently before the court and the violation, in the discretion of the court, supports a finding that no conditions of release can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm to persons or assure the presence of the accused at trial; or
8.a. The defendant has ever been sentenced pursuant to s. 775.082(9) or s. 775.084 as a prison releasee reoffender, habitual violent felony offender, three-time violent felony offender, or violent career criminal, or the state attorney files a notice seeking that the defendant be sentenced pursuant to s. 775.082(9) or s. 775.084, as a prison releasee reoffender, habitual violent felony offender, three-time violent felony offender, or violent career criminal;
b. There is a substantial probability that the defendant committed the offense; and
c. There are no conditions of release that can reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm or ensure the presence of the accused at trial.
(d) If a defendant is arrested for a dangerous crime that is a capital felony, a life felony, or a felony of the first degree, and the court determines there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed the offense, the state attorney, or the court on its own motion, shall motion for pretrial detention. If the court finds a substantial probability that the defendant committed the offense and, based on the defendant’s past and present patterns of behavior, consideration of the criteria in s. 903.046, and any other relevant facts, that no conditions of release or bail will reasonably protect the community from risk of physical harm, ensure the presence of the defendant at trial, or assure the integrity of the judicial process, the court must order pretrial detention.
(e) When a person charged with a crime for which pretrial detention could be ordered is arrested, the arresting agency shall promptly notify the state attorney of the arrest and shall provide the state attorney with such information as the arresting agency has obtained relative to:
1. The nature and circumstances of the offense charged;
2. The nature of any physical evidence seized and the contents of any statements obtained from the defendant or any witness;
3. The defendant’s family ties, residence, employment, financial condition, and mental condition; and
4. The defendant’s past conduct and present conduct, including any record of convictions, previous flight to avoid prosecution, or failure to appear at court proceedings.
(f) When a person charged with a crime for which pretrial detention could be ordered is arrested, the arresting agency may detain such defendant, prior to his or her first appearance hearing or prior to the filing by the state attorney of a motion seeking pretrial detention, for a period not to exceed 24 hours.
(g)1. If a motion for pretrial detention is required under paragraph (d), the pretrial detention hearing must be held within 5 days after the defendant’s first appearance hearing or, if there is no first appearance hearing, within 5 days after the defendant’s arraignment.
2. If a state attorney files a motion for pretrial detention under paragraph (c), the pretrial detention hearing must be held within 5 days after the filing of such motion.
3. The defendant may request a continuance of a pretrial detention hearing. No continuance shall be for longer than 5 days unless there are extenuating circumstances. The state attorney shall be entitled to one continuance for good cause.
4. The defendant may be detained pending the completion of the pretrial detention hearing. If a defendant is released on bail pending a pretrial detention hearing under paragraph (d), the court must inform the defendant that if he or she uses a surety bond to meet the monetary component of pretrial release and the motion for pretrial detention is subsequently granted, the defendant will not be entitled to the return of the premium on such surety bond.
(h) The state attorney has the burden of showing the need for pretrial detention.
(i) The rules concerning admissibility of evidence in criminal trials do not apply to the presentation and consideration of evidence at the detention hearing. The court may base an order of pretrial detention under paragraph (d) solely on hearsay. Evidence secured in violation of the United States Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Florida shall not be admissible.
(j) The defendant is entitled to be represented by counsel, to present witnesses and evidence, and to cross-examine witnesses. No testimony by the defendant shall be admissible to prove guilt at any other judicial proceeding, but such testimony may be admitted in an action for perjury, based upon the defendant’s statements made at the pretrial detention hearing, or for impeachment.
(k) A party may motion for a pretrial detention order to be reconsidered at any time before a defendant’s trial if the judge finds that information exists that was not known to the party moving for reconsideration at the time of the pretrial detention hearing and that such information has a material bearing on determining whether there are conditions of release or bail that will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any other person and the community from harm.
(l) The pretrial detention order of the court shall be based solely upon evidence produced at the hearing and shall contain findings of fact and conclusions of law to support it. The order shall be made either in writing or orally on the record. The court shall render its findings within 24 hours of the pretrial detention hearing.
(m) A defendant convicted at trial following the issuance of a pretrial detention order shall have credited to his or her sentence, if imprisonment is imposed, the time the defendant was held under the order, pursuant to s. 921.161.
(n) The defendant shall be entitled to dissolution of the pretrial detention order whenever the court finds that a subsequent event has eliminated the basis for detention.
History.ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, ch. 82-398; s. 48, ch. 84-103; s. 1, ch. 89-127; s. 2, ch. 89-281; s. 7, ch. 93-212; s. 12, ch. 95-195; s. 25, ch. 96-322; s. 1834, ch. 97-102; s. 106, ch. 99-3; s. 10, ch. 99-188; s. 2, ch. 2000-178; s. 2, ch. 2000-229; s. 24, ch. 2000-320; s. 2, ch. 2001-356; s. 1, ch. 2002-212; s. 16, ch. 2005-128; s. 4, ch. 2006-306; s. 2, ch. 2013-214; s. 7, ch. 2017-23; s. 12, ch. 2017-37; ss. 84, 128, ch. 2019-167; s. 4, ch. 2023-27; s. 1, ch. 2023-225; s. 1, ch. 2024-157.
907.043 Pretrial release; citizens’ right to know.
(1) This section may be cited as the “Citizens’ Right-to-Know Act.”
(2) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Nonsecured release” means the release of a defendant from pretrial custody when no secured surety or cash bond is required as a condition of the release.
(b) “Pretrial release program” means an entity, public or private, that conducts investigations of pretrial detainees, makes pretrial release recommendations to a court, and electronically monitors and supervises pretrial defendants. However, the term “pretrial release program” shall not apply to the Department of Corrections.
(c) “Register” means a public record prepared by a pretrial release program which furnishes specified data and is readily available to the public at the office of the clerk of the circuit court.
(d) “Secured release” means the release of a defendant from pretrial custody with a financial guarantee, such as cash or a surety bond, required as a condition of the release.
(3)(a) Each pretrial release program must prepare a register displaying information that is relevant to the defendants released through such a program. A copy of the register must be located at the office of the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the program is located and must be readily accessible to the public.
(b) The register must be updated weekly and display accurate data regarding the following information:
1. The name, location, and funding source of the pretrial release program.
2. The number of defendants assessed and interviewed for pretrial release.
3. The number of indigent defendants assessed and interviewed for pretrial release.
4. The names and number of defendants accepted into the pretrial release program.
5. The names and number of indigent defendants accepted into the pretrial release program.
6. The charges filed against and the case numbers of defendants accepted into the pretrial release program.
7. The nature of any prior criminal conviction of a defendant accepted into the pretrial release program.
8. The court appearances required of defendants accepted into the pretrial release program.
9. The date of each defendant’s failure to appear for a scheduled court appearance.
10. The number of warrants, if any, which have been issued for a defendant’s arrest for failing to appear at a scheduled court appearance.
11. The number and type of program noncompliance infractions committed by a defendant in the pretrial release program and whether the pretrial release program recommended that the court revoke the defendant’s release.
(4)(a) No later than March 31 of every year, each pretrial release program must submit an annual report for the previous calendar year to the governing body and to the clerk of the circuit court in the county where the pretrial release program is located. The annual report must be readily accessible to the public.
(b) The annual report must contain, but need not be limited to:
1. The name, location, and funding sources of the pretrial release program, including the amount of public funds, if any, received by the pretrial release program.
2. The operating and capital budget of each pretrial release program receiving public funds.
3.a. The percentage of the pretrial release program’s total budget representing receipt of public funds.
b. The percentage of the total budget which is allocated to assisting defendants obtain release through a nonpublicly funded program.
c. The amount of fees paid by defendants to the pretrial release program.
4. The number of persons employed by the pretrial release program.
5. The number of defendants assessed and interviewed for pretrial release.
6. The number of defendants recommended for pretrial release.
7. The number of defendants for whom the pretrial release program recommended against nonsecured release.
8. The number of defendants granted nonsecured release after the pretrial release program recommended nonsecured release.
9. The number of defendants assessed and interviewed for pretrial release who were declared indigent by the court.
10. The number of defendants accepted into a pretrial release program who paid a surety or cash bail or bond.
11. The number of defendants for whom a risk assessment tool was used in determining whether the defendant should be released pending the disposition of the case and the number of defendants for whom a risk assessment tool was not used.
12. The specific statutory citation for each criminal charge related to a defendant whose case is accepted into a pretrial release program, including, at a minimum, the number of defendants charged with dangerous crimes as defined in s. 907.041; nonviolent felonies; or misdemeanors only. A “nonviolent felony” for purposes of this subparagraph excludes the commission of, an attempt to commit, or a conspiracy to commit any of the following:
a. An offense enumerated in s. 775.084(1)(c);
b. An offense that requires a person to register as a sexual predator in accordance with s. 775.21 or as a sexual offender in accordance with s. 943.0435;
c. Failure to register as a sexual predator in violation of s. 775.21 or as a sexual offender in violation of s. 943.0435;
d. Facilitating or furthering terrorism in violation of s. 775.31;
e. A forcible felony as described in s. 776.08;
f. False imprisonment in violation of s. 787.02;
g. Burglary of a dwelling or residence in violation of s. 810.02(3);
h. Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of an elderly person or disabled adult in violation of s. 825.102;
i. Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child in violation of s. 827.03;
j. Poisoning of food or water in violation of s. 859.01;
k. Abuse of a dead human body in violation of s. 872.06;
l. A capital offense in violation of chapter 893;
m. An offense that results in serious bodily injury or death to another human; or
n. A felony offense in which the defendant used a weapon or firearm in the commission of the offense.
13. The number of defendants accepted into a pretrial release program with no prior criminal conviction.
14. The name and case number of each person granted nonsecured release who:
a. Failed to attend a scheduled court appearance.
b. Was issued a warrant for failing to appear.
c. Was arrested for any offense while on release through the pretrial release program.
15. Any additional information deemed necessary by the governing body to assess the performance and cost efficiency of the pretrial release program.
History.s. 1, ch. 2008-224; s. 4, ch. 2018-127; s. 21, ch. 2021-156.
907.044 Annual study of pretrial release program effectiveness and cost efficiency.The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability shall conduct an annual study to evaluate the effectiveness and cost efficiency of pretrial release programs in this state. The study’s scope shall include, but need not be limited to, gathering information pertaining to the funding sources of each pretrial release program, the nature of criminal convictions of defendants accepted into the programs, the number of failed court appearances by defendants accepted into each program, and the number of warrants issued subsequently for defendants in each program, as well as the program’s compliance with the provisions of this section. OPPAGA shall submit a report to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by January 1 of each year.
History.s. 4, ch. 2008-224; s. 128, ch. 2023-8.
907.045 Habeas corpus; motion to dismiss; preliminary hearing.A defendant who is in custody when an indictment, information, or affidavit on which she or he can be tried is filed may apply for a writ of habeas corpus attacking the indictment, information, or affidavit, or the defendant may move to dismiss the indictment, information, or affidavit. A defendant who has been confined for 30 days after her or his arrest without a trial shall be allowed a preliminary hearing upon application.
History.s. 140, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(147); s. 1, ch. 26767, 1951; s. 69, ch. 70-339; s. 1509, ch. 97-102.
Note.Former s. 909.04.

F.S. 907 on Google Scholar

F.S. 907 on Casetext

Amendments to 907


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 907
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 907.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 907

Total Results: 20

Larry Darnell Young v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-25T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: at 115 (quoting United States v. Loera, 923 F.3d 907, 917, 922 (10th Cir. 2019)). Turning to the

Tyrone T. Johnson v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-09-19T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: defendant shot at his arresting officers. Id. at 907. It concluded there was no error because the evidence

Celebrity Actor's Camp, Inc., Winebarger v. McLaughlin, Bredbrenner

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-18T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: not a substitute for evidence. See Romeo v. Romeo, 907 So. 2d 1279, 1284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ("[I]t

Buis, Buis v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-06T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: imposes a new penalty.2 See Hughes, 374 So. 3d at 907 ("Even if we agreed with the Fourth District

Mollica v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-06T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: conditions of his confinement. See, e.g., Broom v. State, 907 So. 2d 1261, 1262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("The circuit

James Walsh, Attorney Ad Litem, on Behalf of A.K.P., a Minor Child, and Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office v. Department of Children and Families

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-04T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 230 So. 3d 905, 907 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); M.A. v. Dep’t of Child. &

ALBERT ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA AND GRADY JUDD, SHERIFF OF POLK COUNTY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-26T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: to section 907.041, now located at section 907.041(5)(d), Florida Statutes. 1 Section 907.041(5)(d) states…subsection to Section 907.041, now located at Section 907.041(5)(d).4 Section 907.041(5)(d) states: …court’s compliance with Section 907.041 The amendment to Section 907.041 did not change the requirements…pretrial detention hearing. § 907.041(5)(l), Fla. Stat. (2024) 11; § 907.041(5)(i), Fla. Stat. (2023)12… Section 907.041(5)(k). Effective May 6, 2024, this provision is now numbered as Section 907.041(5)(l)

Loran Cole v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-08-23T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 12/06/a-roster- of-the-lost/; Bobby M. v. Chiles, 907 F. Supp. 368, 369 (N.D. Fla. 1995).

Kenneth James Kendrick v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-08-22T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (table); Kendrick v. State, 907 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (table); Kendrick v

Kenneth James Kendrick v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-08-22T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (table); Kendrick v. State, 907 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (table); Kendrick v

Kenneth James Kendrick v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-08-22T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (table); Kendrick v. State, 907 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (table); Kendrick v

Doug Schroer v. Crumdale Partners, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-21T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Ctr., Inc. v. McCormick 105, LLC, 302 So. 3d 905, 907 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020). The specific question here

Doug Schroer v. Crumdale Partners, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-21T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Ctr., Inc. v. McCormick 105, LLC, 302 So. 3d 905, 907 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020). The specific question here

Omega Insurance Company v. MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: S.E. First Nat’l Bank of Mia., 415 So. 2d 906, 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (“Under [section 47.051], a cause

Boca View Condominium Association, Inc. v. Eleanor Lepselter and Edward Lepselter

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: awarded appellees $194,875 in attorney’s fees and $31,907.97 in costs. The Association appeals the order

City of Miramar v. Donald Spadaro and Anthony Caravella

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-17T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Spadaro v. City of Miramar, 591 Fed. Appx. 906, 907-08 (11th Cir. 2015). Despite the federal court

LEVEL 8 MANAGEMENT, INC., PIERRE ACCOUNTING, P. C. v. WILDFLOWER LEGACY AND WEALTH PLANNING, LLC

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-17T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: quot; (quoting DeVaney v. Rumsch, 228 So. 2d 904, 907 (Fla. 1969))). In Vernon, the estate sued the

Tyrone T. Johnson v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-07-11T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: defendant shot at his arresting officers. Id. at 907. It concluded there was no error because the evidence

C.W.R.K. v. Stewart-Marchman-Act-Behavioral Healthcare (SMA), Deland Men's Residential Treatment Center (DMRT)

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-12T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: 2012) (citing Vaughn v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 907 So.2d 1248, 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)). While judges

Beaches MRI a/a/o Eileen Thibodeaux v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: constitute evidence.’”) (quoting Romeo v. Romeo, 907 So. 2d 1279, 1284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)).