921.244
Order of no contact; penalties.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
921.244 Order of no contact; penalties.—
(1) At the time of sentencing an offender convicted of a violation of s. 794.011, s. 800.04, s. 847.0135(5), or any offense in s. 775.084(1)(b)1.a.-o., the court shall order that the offender be prohibited from having any contact with the victim, directly or indirectly, including through a third person, for the duration of the sentence imposed. The court may reconsider the order upon the request of the victim if the request is made at any time after the victim has attained 18 years of age. In considering the request, the court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether a change of circumstances has occurred which warrants a change in the court order prohibiting contact and whether it is in the best interest of the victim that the court order be modified or rescinded.
History.—s. 2, ch. 2004-256; s. 24, ch. 2008-172; s. 1, ch. 2008-251.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2010–2024 · leading case: Johnson v. State
Johnson v. State (2010)
“Section 921.244(1), Florida Statutes (2008), authorizes a court to prohibit an offender convicted of lewd and lascivious crimes from having contact with his victims.”
Beebe v. Hanks (Pinellas County) (2022)
“§ 921.244, Fla. Stat.; Doc. 10-2, Ex. 1, pp.”
EDDIE DIXON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
“See § 921.244(1), Fla. Stat. (2020). These no-contact orders preclude defendants from contacting their victims, directly or indirectly, throughout their sentences.”
— 921.244(1) — 3 cases
Johnson v. State (2010)
“Section 921.244(1), Florida Statutes (2008), authorizes a court to prohibit an offender convicted of lewd and lascivious crimes from having contact with his victims.”
EDDIE DIXON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
“See § 921.244(1), Fla. Stat. (2020). These no-contact orders preclude defendants from contacting their victims, directly or indirectly, throughout their sentences.”
Beebe v. Hanks (Pinellas County) (2022)
“§ 921.244, Fla. Stat.; Doc. 10-2, Ex. 1, pp.”
— 921.244(2) — 1 case
EDDIE DIXON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
“See § 921.244(1), Fla. Stat. (2020). These no-contact orders preclude defendants from contacting their victims, directly or indirectly, throughout their sentences.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.