Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 1010.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 1010.11 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 1010.11

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1010
FINANCIAL MATTERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 1010.11
1010.11 Electronic transfer of funds.Pursuant to the provisions of s. 215.85, each district school board, Florida College System institution board of trustees, and university board of trustees shall adopt written policies prescribing the accounting and control procedures under which any funds under their control are allowed to be moved by electronic transaction for any purpose including direct deposit, wire transfer, withdrawal, investment, or payment. Electronic transactions shall comply with the provisions of chapter 668. However, a district school board is exempt from the requirements of s. 668.50(18)(b).
History.s. 535, ch. 2002-387; s. 24, ch. 2009-59; s. 157, ch. 2011-5; s. 14, ch. 2024-159.

F.S. 1010.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1010.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 1010.11


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1010.11
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1010.11.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1010.11

Total Results: 20

Curtis M. Gorham v. Dr. Gary H. Lavine, Dr. Emily D. Billingsley, Kendrea Virgil, RN, Lloyd G. Logue, Donna Baird, Joseph R. Impicciche (CEO), Junco Emergency Physicians

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-29

Snippet: See Hinote v. Ford Motor Co., 958 So. 2d 1009, 1010–11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (explaining that a dismissal

Gorham v. State of Florida, Lavine

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-29

Snippet: See Hinote v. Ford Motor Co., 958 So. 2d 1009, 1010–11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (explaining that a dismissal

Gorham v. Cousin, Baird

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-29

Snippet: See Hinote v. Ford Motor Co., 958 So. 2d 1009, 1010–11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (explaining that a dismissal

Perry James Ford, Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-13

Citation: 267 So. 3d 1070

Snippet: circumstantial. Knight v. State, 186 So. 3d 1005, 1010-11 (Fla. 2016).

Treasure Coast Marina, LC, etc. v. the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-15

Citation: 219 So. 3d 793, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 650, 2017 WL 2590803, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1322

Snippet: contained within a recreational facility. Id. at 1010-11. The Islamorada ‘ court’s analysis turned on whether

Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-10

Citation: 204 So. 3d 22, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 506, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2487

Snippet: Statutes (2007), was applicable instead. Id. at 1010-11. The district court noted that section 768.28,

City of Fort Pierce v. Treasure Coast Marina, LC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-31

Citation: 195 So. 3d 1141, 2016 WL 3087680, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8184

Snippet: (Fla.1994); see also Islamorada, 882 So.2d at 1010-11; Panama City, 93 So.2d at 613. The present case

The City of Fort Pierce, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, Fort Pierce Redevelopment Agency, etc. v. Treasure Coast Marina, LC, a Florida limited liability company, Riverfront Development, LC, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-05-25

Citation: 195 So. 3d 1141

Snippet: (Fla. 1994); see also Islamorada, 882 So. 2d at 1010-11; Panama City, 93 So. 2d at 613. The present

The City of Fort Pierce, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation, Fort Pierce Redevelopment Agency, etc. v. Treasure Coast Marina, LC, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-27

Snippet: (Fla. 1994); see also Islamorada, 882 So. 2d at 1010-11; Panama City, 93 So. 2d at 613. The present

& SC14-887 Neil K. Salazar v. State of Florida and Neil K. Salazar v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-18

Citation: 188 So. 3d 799

Snippet: phase in Hurst v. State, 18 So.3d 975, 1010-11 (Fla.2009), where evidence was presented during

Bank of New York Mellon v. Mestre

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-03-13

Citation: 159 So. 3d 953, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3585, 2015 WL 1071113

Snippet: See Hinote v. Ford Motor Co., 958 So.2d 1009, 1010-11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ("The order of dismissal is

Trans Health Management Inc. v. Nunziata

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-12-19

Citation: 159 So. 3d 850, 2014 WL 7202711

Snippet: see also O’Riley v. Rogers, 69 A.3d 1007, 1010-11 (Del.2013) (“A trial judge has a duty to make sure

Montero ex rel. W.P.M. v. Duval County School Board

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-12-18

Citation: 153 So. 3d 407, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20565, 2014 WL 7184294

Snippet: See Hiñóte v. Ford Motor Co., 958 So.2d 1009, 1010-11 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“The order of dismissal is

Herman v. Intracoastal Cardiology Center

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-08-07

Citation: 121 So. 3d 583, 2013 WL 4007196, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12336

Snippet: Bass v. City of Pembroke Pines, 991 So.2d 1008, 1010-11 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); JVA Enters., 48 So.3d at 112

State v. Dudley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-07-01

Citation: 64 So. 3d 746, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10380, 2011 WL 2581772

Snippet: her pri- or boyfriend were consensual.” Id. at 1010-11. That concession itself would seem to preclude

Gilbert v. Florida Power & Light Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-14

Citation: 981 So. 2d 609, 2008 WL 2038035

Snippet: collateral estoppel and/or res judicata. Id. at 1010-11. Upon review, this court reversed, finding that

Mariano v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-05-31

Citation: 933 So. 2d 111, 2006 WL 1476171

Snippet: inadmissible matters. See Gelabert, 407 So.2d at 1010-11. The defendant's case rested on the proposition

Kasm v. Kasm

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-05-19

Citation: 933 So. 2d 48, 2006 WL 1359636

Snippet: See, e.g., Robbie v. Robbie, 591 So.2d 1006, 1010-11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (Polen, J., concurring in part

Maras v. Still

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-04-28

Citation: 927 So. 2d 192, 2006 WL 1114980

Snippet: of the parties' children to the mother. Id. at 1010-11. Later, the father filed a motion seeking to keep

Islamorada, Village of Islands v. Higgs

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-08-11

Citation: 882 So. 2d 1009, 2003 WL 22715633

Snippet: Islamorada, 28 Fla. L. Weekly at D2650, 882 So.2d at 1010-11. [8] It is not a cheap place to park your Bertram