O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-1-256 (2019)

Legislative intent in construction of Code Section It is the intent of the General Assembly that, in construing Code Section 10-1-254, due consideration and great weight be given to the interpretation of the federal courts relating to Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 13(a)-(f)

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History

Code 1981, § 10-1-256, enacted by Ga. L. 1985, p. 458, § 1.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Meeting competition defense under § 2(b) of Clayton Act, as amended by

Robinson-Patman Act (15 § 13(b)), 164 A.L.R. Fed. 633.

ARTICLE 10 SALE AND STORAGE OF LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS Administrative rules and regulations. Liquefied Petroleum Gases, Official Compilation of the Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia, Office of

Commissioner of Insurance, Safety Fire Commissioner and Industrial Loan Commissioner, Safety Fire Commissioner, Rule 120-3-16-.01 et seq.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Provisions enacted for public benefit. - Ga. L. 1949, p. 1128, § 1 and Ga. L. 1949, p. 1057, § 1 et seq. were passed for the public benefit and are statutes of public policy. Bishop v. Act-O-Lane Gas Serv. Co., 91 Ga. App.

154, 85 S.E.2d 169, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 888 (1954). O.C.G.A. Art. 10, Ch. 1, T. 10 and O.C.G.A. § 25-2-1 et seq. construed together. - To give effect to the intent of the General Assembly, Ga. L. 1949, p.

1128, § 1 and Ga. L. 1949, p. 1057, § 1 et seq. should be construed together, as both sought to remedy an evil which then existed, and the statutes prescribed a remedy for the public good. Bishop v. Act-O-Lane Gas Serv. Co., 91 Ga. App. 154, 85 S.E.2d 169, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 888 (1954). Statute authorizing waiver of benefit of law inapplicable to safety regulations. - The exception in former Code 1933, § 102-106 that “a person may waive or renounce what the law has established in his favor when he does not thereby injure others or affect the public interest” had no application when the contract attempted to release a party from liability for acts violating liquefied gas safety regulations. Bishop v. Act-O-Lane Gas Serv. Co., 91 Ga. App. 154, 85 S.E.2d 169, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 888 (1954). Distributor not released from liability for negligence. - A liquefied

petroleum distributor is without authority of law to release the distributor from liability by a contract or otherwise because of damage resulting from the negligence of such distributor. Bishop v. Act-O-Lane Gas Serv. Co., 91 Ga. App. 154, 85 S.E.2d 169, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 888 (1954). Gas company is not insurer of safety of customers and their agents and invitees. Womack v. Central Ga. Gas Co., 85 Ga. App. 799, 70 S.E.2d 398, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 832 (1952). Gas company is liable only for acts of negligence. Womack v. Central Ga. Gas Co., 85 Ga. App. 799, 70 S.E.2d 398, 1952 Ga. App. LEXIS 832 (1952).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Rights, under oil and gas lease, deed, or sales contract, to “distillate,” “condensate,” or “natural gasoline,” 38 A.L.R.3d 983. Liability of one selling or distributing

liquid or bottled fuel gas, for personal injury, death, or property damage, 41 A.L.R.3d 782. Gasoline or other fuel storage tanks as nuisance, 50 A.L.R.3d 209.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 658 S.E.2d 603 (Ga. 2008).
Mason v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 658 S.E.2d 603 (Ga. 2008). · cites it 3× “Unlike OCGA *615 § 10-1-256 and OCGA § 10-1-391, which expressly reference the Federal legislation that was the source for those statutory provisions, the Legislature did not indicate that OCGA § 24-9-67.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.