O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 10-1-660 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This part shall be known and may be cited as the “Motor Vehicle Fair Practices Act.”
History
Code 1981, § 10-1-660, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1585, § 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2026 · leading case: Nissan North Am., Inc. v. Walker-Jones Nissan, LLC, 812 S.E.2d 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).
Nissan North Am., Inc. v. Walker-Jones Nissan, LLC, 812 S.E.2d 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). “" OCGA § 10-1-660. The ROFR statute is found therein, and it provides a mechanism whereby, in the event of a proposed change of ownership or transfer of dealership assets, a franchisor may acquire the original dealer's assets or ownership if six enumerated requirements are met:…”
Nissan North Am., Inc. v. Walker-Jones Nissan, LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). “” OCGA § 10-1-660. The ROFR statute is found therein, and it provides a mechanism whereby, in the event of a proposed change of ownership or transfer of dealership assets, a franchisor may acquire the original dealer’s assets or ownership if six enumerated requirements are met:…”
Lucid Grp. USA, Inc. v. State of Georgia (Ga. 2026). “This case concerns several provisions of the Motor Vehicle Fair Practices Act, OCGA § 10-1-660 et seq., a subdivision of the Georgia Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act, OCGA § 10-1-620 et seq.”
Lucid Grp. USA, Inc. v. State of Georgia (Ga. 2026). “This case concerns several provisions of the Motor Vehicle Fair Practices Act, OCGA § 10-1-660 et seq., a subdivision of the Georgia Motor Vehicle Franchise Practices Act, OCGA § 10-1-620 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.