O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-1-675 (2019)

Legislative findings

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds and declares that the distribution of marine vessels and products in the State of Georgia vitally affects the general economy of the state and the public interest and public welfare and, in the exercise of its police power, it is necessary to regulate marine manufacturers, distributors, and dealers and their representatives doing business in Georgia in order to prevent unfair business practices, unfair methods of competition, impositions, and other abuses upon its citizens.

History

Code 1981, § 10-1-675, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 778, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Houseboat Store, LLC v. Chris-Craft Corp., 692 S.E.2d 61 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Houseboat Store, LLC v. Chris-Craft Corp., 692 S.E.2d 61 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “The Houseboat Store, LLC (“Houseboat”) filed this action against Chris-Craft Corporation (“Chris-Craft”) to recover damages under the marine manufacturers statute (OCGA § 10-1-675 et seq.) following Chris-Craft’s termination of a dealer agreement (“dealer agreement”) for the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.