O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 10-1-703 (2019)
Waiver of law prohibited
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The provisions of this article may not be waived; and, in applying the provisions of this article, the courts of this state shall not recognize any purported waiver of the provisions of this article, whether by expressed waiver or by attempt to make a contract or agreement subject to the laws of another state.
History
Code 1981, § 10-1-703, enacted by Ga. L. 1986, p. 884, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2009–2010 · leading case: Vertex Surgical, Inc. v. Paradigm Biodevices, Inc., 390 F. App'x 1 (1st Cir. 2010).
Vertex Surgical, Inc. v. Paradigm Biodevices, Inc., 390 F. App'x 1 (1st Cir. 2010). “” Ga. Code Ann. § 10-1-703 . Vertex moved for summary judgment on the Georgia statutory claim, which the district court understood to depend on whether the Georgia law “can affect the rights of the parties, given the Agreement’s choice of Massachusetts law to govern the terms of…”
Vertex Surgical, Inc. v. Paradigm Biodevices, Inc., 648 F. Supp. 2d 184 (D. Mass. 2009). “” Ga.Code Ann. § 10-1-703. Vertex argues that because of this non-waiver provision, a Massachusetts choice of law provision cannot effectively bar the GWDA from governing the payment of overdue commissions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.