O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 10-1-870 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article shall be known and may be cited as the “Assistive Technology Warranty Act.”
History
Code 1981, § 10-1-870, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1797, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1995–2011 · leading case: Salvador v. Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n Ex Rel. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Salvador), 456 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2011).
Salvador v. Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n Ex Rel. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Salvador), 456 B.R. 610 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2011). “), the Georgia Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Acts (“UDTPA”) (O.C.GA. §§ 10-1-870 et seq.), the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act of 1975 (“FBPA”) (O.”
Bartels v. Alabama Com. Coll., Inc., 54 F.3d 702 (11th Cir. 1995). “3 Count III alleged a violation of Georgia’s Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, O.C.G.A. §§ 10-1-870 et seq., on the part of all the appellees based on, among other grounds, their failure to ensure that the appellants’ student loan contracts contained the FTC Holder Rule,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.