O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 10-4-1 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article shall be known and may be cited as the “Georgia State Warehouse Act.”
History
Ga. L. 1953, Nov.-Dec. Sess., p. 412, § 1; Ga. L. 2024, p. 1052, § 2(39)/SB 448, effective July 1, 2024. Amendments. The 2024 amendment, effective July 1, 2024, part of an Act to revise, modern-
ize, and correct the Code, inserted “be known and may” following “shall” in this Code section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1992–1992 · leading case: Planters & Citizens Bank v. Home Ins. Co., 786 F. Supp. 977 (S.D. Ga. 1992).
Planters & Citizens Bank v. Home Ins. Co., 786 F. Supp. 977 (S.D. Ga. 1992). “1991), and the Warehouse Division of the GDOA performed inspections pursuant to the Georgia State Warehouse Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-4-1 et seq. (1989). Over the years, the GDOA’s Consumer Protection Division detected many problems with the pecans stored at Mascot Pecan.”
Planters & Citizens Bank v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins., 786 F. Supp. 991 (S.D. Ga. 1992). “The Warehouse Division performed, inspections pursuant to the Georgia State Warehouse Act, O.C.G.A. § 10-4-1 et seq. (1989). Defendant Cameron Crummey was a Warehouse Division inspector, responsible for examining Mascot Pecan and determining whether Mascot Pecan’s warehouse was…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.