O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 10-7-23 (2019)

Refusal to deliver evidence of debt and securities on tender of amount of debt as discharging surety

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The surety may tender to the creditor the amount of his debt and demand that the evidence of and the securities for the same be delivered up to him to be enforced against his principal or cosureties; and a failure of the creditor to comply, when within his power, shall operate to discharge the surety.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 2132; Code 1868, § 2127; Code 1873, § 2155; Code 1882, § 2155; Civil Code 1895, § 2973; Civil Code 1910, § 3545; Code 1933, § 103-204.

Annotations

Law reviews. For article surveying developments in Georgia commercial law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 33 (1981).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Only person making tender is discharged. - This section provides only for the discharge of the person whose tender was refused. Hall v. First Nat’l Bank, 145 Ga. App. 267, 243 S.E.2d 569, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1944 (1978). Burden upon surety to prove tender and demand. - When, to an action by the former state superintendent of banks, the surety pleaded that the surety was discharged by a refusal of a tender and demand allowable under this

section, the burden was upon the surety to prove that the tender and demand had been made either to the superintendent of banks or to one duly authorized by the surety, as provided by statute, to make collections for the bank. Bennett v. Simmons, 30 Ga. App. 529, 118 S.E. 493, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 522 (1923). Transfer of security proper. - Summary judgment for a bank was properly entered after the bank demanded that a guarantor pay off an outstanding

business debt, and upon demand of the guarantor, transferred the security for the loan, a mortgage on the homeowners’ home, to the guarantor; under O.C.G.A. § 10-7-23, upon demand, the bank was required to transfer the securities to the

guarantor paying off the debt or it would lose the ability to enforce the debt against the guarantor. Phillips v. First Bank of Ga., 257 Ga. App. 342, 571 S.E.2d 410, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1155 (2002).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 74 Am. Jur. 2d, Suretyship, § 132 et seq. C.J.S. 72 C.J.S., Principal and Surety, §§ 106, 112. ALR. Release of payee from warranty constituting a part of the consideration for a note as releasing a surety, 7 A.L.R. 1605.

Incapacity of principal to contract as affecting liability of guarantor or surety, 24 A.L.R. 838; 43 A.L.R. 589. Application of payments as between debts for which a surety or guarantor is bound and those for which he is not, 57 A.L.R.2d 855.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Phillips v. First Bank of Georgia, 571 S.E.2d 410 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).
Phillips v. First Bank of Georgia, 571 S.E.2d 410 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “With regard to banking loans, OCGA § 10-7-23 plainly provides: “The surety may tender to the creditor the amount of his debt and demand that the evidence of and the securities for the same be delivered up to him to be enforced against his principal or cosureties; and a failure…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.