O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 11-2-208 (2019)

[Reserved] Course of performance or practical construction

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History

Code 1933, § 109A-2-208, enacted by Ga. L. 1962, p. 156, § 1; repealed by Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 3B-3/SB 65, effective January 1, 2016.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 3B-3/SB 65 repealed and reserved this Code section, effective January 1, 2016.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1992–2010 · leading case: Scovill Fasteners, Inc. v. N. Metals, Inc., 692 S.E.2d 840 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Scovill Fasteners, Inc. v. N. Metals, Inc., 692 S.E.2d 840 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “4 Similarly, OCGA § 11-2-208 (2) provides that “[t]he express terms of the agreement and any such course of performance .”

Dixie Aluminum Prods. Co. v. Mitsubishi Int'l Corp., 785 F. Supp. 157 (N.D. Ga. 1992). · cites it 2× “” Where, as here, there are repeated opportunities for performance by either party and repeated opportunities for objection, and where no objection is made, that course of dealing is relevant to the meaning and terms of the written agreement, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-208(1), and bears on…”

— 11-2-208(1) — 1 case

Dixie Aluminum Prods. Co. v. Mitsubishi Int'l Corp., 785 F. Supp. 157 (N.D. Ga. 1992). “” Where, as here, there are repeated opportunities for performance by either party and repeated opportunities for objection, and where no objection is made, that course of dealing is relevant to the meaning and terms of the written agreement, O.C.G.A. § 11-2-208(1), and bears on…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.