O.C.G.A.

11-2A-108 (2019)

Unconscionability

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) If the court as a matter of law finds a lease contract or any clause of a lease contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the lease contract, or it may enforce the remainder of the lease contract without the unconscionable clause, or it may so limit the application of any unconscionable clause as to avoid any unconscionable result. (2) With respect to a consumer lease, if the court as a matter of law finds that a lease contract or any clause of a lease contract has been induced by unconscionable conduct or that unconscionable conduct has occurred in the collection of a claim arising from a lease contract, the court may grant appropriate relief. (3) Before making a finding of unconscionability under subsection (1) or (2), the court, on its own motion or that of a party, shall afford the parties a reasonable opportunity to present evidence as to the setting, purpose, and effect of the lease contract or clause thereof, or of the conduct. (4) In an action in which the lessee claims unconscionability with respect to a consumer lease: (a) If the court finds unconscionability under subsection (1) or (2), the court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees to the lessee. (b) If the court does not find unconscionability and the lessee claiming unconscionability has brought or maintained an action he knew to be groundless, the court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees to the party against whom the claim is made. (c) In determining attorney’s fees, the amount of the recovery on behalf of the claimant under subsections (1) and (2) is not controlling.

History

Code 1981, § 11-2A-108, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 633, § 1.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES U.L.A. Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 2A-108.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–1998 · leading case: Mitchell v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 68 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (N.D. Ga. 1998).
Mitchell v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 68 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (N.D. Ga. 1998). · cites it 6× “Georgia has codified the doctrine of unconscio-nability as applied to consumer leases in its Uniform Commercial Code at O.C.G.A. § 11-2A-108. Subsections (1) and (2) of this statute are its only substantive provisions; the other two subsections are procedural.”
BMW Fin. Servs., N.A., Inc. v. Smoke Rise Corp., 486 S.E.2d 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Such a charge serves the necessary commercial function of compensating for out-of-the-ordinary usage which will affect the residual value of the car.”
Kondo v. Marietta Toyota, Inc., 480 S.E.2d 851 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs lastly argue the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on Count 3 of plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleging unconscionable conduct under OCGA § 11-2A-108 was premature because the amended complaint was filed just two days before the hearing on defendants’ original…”
— 11-2A-108(2) — 1 case
Mitchell v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 68 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (N.D. Ga. 1998). “Georgia has codified the doctrine of unconscio-nability as applied to consumer leases in its Uniform Commercial Code at O.C.G.A. § 11-2A-108. Subsections (1) and (2) of this statute are its only substantive provisions; the other two subsections are procedural.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.