O.C.G.A.
11-4A-102 (2019)
Subject matter
✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as otherwise provided in Code Section 11-4A-108, this article applies to funds transfers defined in Code Section 11-4A-104.
History
Code 1981, § 11-4A-102, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2685, § 4.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES U.L.A. Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 4A-102. ALR. Construction and application to immediate parties of Uniform Commercial Code
Article 4A governing funds transfers, 62 A.L.R.6th 1. Effect of Uniform Commercial Code Article 4A on attachment, garnishment, forfeiture or other third-party process against funds transfers, 66 A.L.R.6th 567.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Zeal Global Servs. Private Ltd. v. Suntrust Bank, 508 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (N.D. Ga. 2020).
Zeal Global Servs. Private Ltd. v. Suntrust Bank, 508 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (N.D. Ga. 2020). “because (1) its claims are based on Defendants’ conduct “prior or subsequent to the funds transfer process” and (2) Article 4A is “silent as to claims based on a theory that the beneficiary bank accepted funds when it knew or should have known that the funds were fraudulently…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.