Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448If a transaction is evidenced by records that include an instrument or series of instruments, the group of records taken together constitutes chattel paper.
"Applicant." Code Section 11-5-102.
"Beneficiary." Code Section 11-5-102.
"Broker." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Certificated security." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Check." Code Section 11-3-104.
"Clearing corporation." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Contract for sale." Code Section 11-2-106.
"Customer." Code Section 11-4-104.
"Entitlement holder." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Financial asset." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Holder in due course." Code Section 11-3-302.
"Issuer" (with respect to a letter of credit or letter of credit right). Code Section 11-5-102.
"Issuer" (with respect to a security). Code Section 11-8-201.
"Issuer" (with respect to documents of title). Code Section 11-7-102.
"Lease." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Lease agreement." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Lease contract." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Leasehold interest." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Lessee." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Lessee in ordinary course of business." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Lessor." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Lessor's residual interest." Code Section 11-2A-103.
"Letter of credit." Code Section 11-5-102.
"Merchant." Code Section 11-2-104.
"Negotiable instrument." Code Section 11-3-104.
"Nominated person." Code Section 11-5-102.
"Note." Code Section 11-3-104.
"Proceeds of a letter of credit." Code Section 11-5-114.
"Prove." Code Section 11-3-103.
"Sale." Code Section 11-2-106.
"Securities account." Code Section 11-8-501.
"Securities intermediary." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Security." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Security certificate." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Security entitlement." Code Section 11-8-102.
"Uncertificated security." Code Section 11-8-102.
(Code 1981, §11-9-102, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 995, § 3; Ga. L. 2010, p. 481, § 2-19/HB 451; Ga. L. 2013, p. 690, § 1/SB 185; Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 3B-18/SB 65.)
The 2002 amendment, effective July 1, 2002, in subsection (a), deleted ", other than a security interest," in paragraph (5) and added "or to be provided" at the end of paragraph (47).
The 2010 amendment, effective May 27, 2010, in subsection (b), substituted the present introductory paragraph for the former provisions, which read: "Other definitions applying to this article and the Code sections in which they appear are" and added the provisions on "'Issuer' (with respect to documents of title)". See the Editor's notes for applicability.
The 2013 amendment, effective July 1, 2013, substituted "With present intent to adopt or accept a record, to attach to or logically associate with such record an electronic sound, symbol, or process" for "To execute or otherwise adopt a symbol, or encrypt or similarly process a record in whole or in part, with the present intent of the authenticating person to identify the person and adopt or accept a record" in subparagraph (a)(7)(B); added the last sentence in paragraph (a)(11); inserted "formed or" in paragraph (a)(51); redesignated former paragraphs (a)(67) through (a)(79) as current paragraphs (a)(68) through (a)(80), respectively; added present paragraph (a)(67); and rewrote paragraph (a)(70).
The 2015 amendment, effective January 1, 2016, substituted "Reserved" for " 'Good faith' means honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing" in paragraph (a)(44).
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2001, "Code Section" was inserted preceding "11-5-118" at the end of subparagraph (a)(71)(F).
- Ga. L. 2002, p. 995, § 8, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act shall become effective July 1, 2002, and shall apply to a letter of credit that is issued on or after July 1, 2002. This Act does not apply to a transaction, event, obligation, or duty arising out of or associated with a letter of credit that was issued before July 1, 2002."
Ga. L. 2010, p. 481, § 3-1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "This Act applies to a document of title that is issued or a bailment that arises on or after the effective date of this Act. This Act does not apply to a document of title that is issued or a bailment that arises before the effective date of this Act even if the document of title or bailment would be subject to this Act if the document of title had been issued or bailment had arisen on or after the effective date of this Act. This Act does not apply to a right of action that has accrued before the effective date of this Act." This Act became effective May 27, 2010.
Ga. L. 2010, p. 481, § 3-2, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "A document of title issued or a bailment that arises before the effective date of this Act and the rights, documents, and interests flowing from that document or bailment are governed by any statute or other rule amended or repealed by this Act as if such amendment or repeal had not occurred and may be terminated, completed, consummated, or enforced under that statute or other rule." This Act became effective May 27, 2010.
Ga. L. 2015, p. 996, § 1-1/SB 65, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "(a) This Act shall be known and may be cited as the 'Debtor-Creditor Uniform Law Modernization Act of 2015.'
"(b) To promote consistency among the states, it is the intent of the General Assembly to modernize certain existing uniform laws promulgated by the Uniform Law Commission affecting debtor and creditor rights, responsibilities, and relationships and other federally recognized laws affecting such rights, responsibilities, and relationships."
- For article discussing the resolution of conflicting claims to goods between an unsecured seller of goods and a creditor of a buyer claiming under an after-acquired property clause, see 28 Mercer L. Rev. 625 (1977). For article, "The Revisions to Article IX of the Uniform Commercial Code," see 15 Ga. St. B.J. 120 (1977). For article, "The Good Faith Purchase Idea and the Uniform Commercial Code," see 15 Ga. L. Rev. 605 (1981). For article discussing the classification of a continuing security interest in changing collateral as an unenforceable preference under Section 60a of the Bankruptcy Act, see 1 Ga. L. Rev. 257 (1967). For article, "Preparing the Georgia Farmer (or Other Smaller Entrepreneur) for Bankruptcy," see 22 Ga. State Bar J. 186 (1986). For annual survey article on commercial law, see 50 Mercer L. Rev. 193 (1998). For article surveying developments in Georgia commercial law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 33 (1981). For article, "Leveraged Buyouts in Bankruptcy," see 20 Ga. L. Rev. 73 (1985). For annual survey of commercial law, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 119 (1991). For note discussing creditor's remedy of direct collection of accounts and instruments owed to the defaulting debtor, see 3 Ga. L. Rev. 198 (1968). For comment on Maley v. National Acceptance Co., 250 F. Supp. 841 (N.D. Ga. 1966), see 3 Ga. St. B.J. 248 (1966). For comment on Sherrock v. Commercial Credit Corp., 290 A.2d 648 (Del. S. Ct. 1972), see 10 Ga. St. B.J. 110 (1973).
- In the light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Article 9 are included in the annotations for this Code section. For a table of comparable provisions, see the table at the beginning of the Article.
This section defines "account" in the sense of collateral. Metter Banking Co. v. Fisher Foods, Inc., 183 Ga. App. 441, 359 S.E.2d 145, cert. denied, 183 Ga. App. 906, 359 S.E.2d 145 (1987) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- This statute is in derogation of common law and must be strictly construed and followed. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 152 Ga. App. 176, 262 S.E.2d 485 (1979) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- A bankruptcy debtor's unearned postpetition income under a contract for employment did not constitute proceeds of the creditor's prepetition interest in accounts receivable. In re Rumker, 184 Bankr. 621 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 1995) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- In addition to a trademark, a trade name, along with the goodwill it represents, may be the subject of an Article 9 security interest and may be reacquired along with other secured property on foreclosure. Reis v. Ralls, 250 Ga. 721, 301 S.E.2d 40 (1983) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
Computer information and programming recorded on magnetic tape were "general intangibles" which are not included in the types of collateral in which security interests can be perfected by possession under former § 11-9-305 (see now O.C.G.A. § 11-9-313), and a security interest therein could therefore only be perfected by filing a financing statement. Dabney v. Information Exch., Inc., 98 Bankr. 603 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1989) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- The Farmers Home Administration, which had a pre-petition security agreement extending to the bankruptcy debtors' "farm products," including milk, had a lien which attached to milk proceeds created post bankruptcy. Post-petition milk diversion program payments, therefore, were substitutes for post-petition milk and proceeds, to which the lien attached, and were not "general intangibles." United States v. Hollie, 42 Bankr. 111 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1984) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
Property listed in financing statements need not be specific but must only reasonably identify same, giving dates leases and amount of same, "secured by" equipment listed in leases and its location. Stephens v. Bank of Camilla, 133 Ga. App. 210, 210 S.E.2d 358 (1974), aff'd, 234 Ga. 293, 216 S.E.2d 71 (1975) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- Goods are classified as consumer goods, equipment, farm products, and inventory. Williams v. Western Pac. Fin. Corp., 643 F.2d 331 (5th Cir. 1981) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- Filing of financing statement can perfect only those interests acquired through security agreements. Tri-County Livestock Auction Co. v. Bank of Madison, 228 Ga. 325, 185 S.E.2d 393 (1971) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- Where evidence supports trial court's holding that wife is entitled to a special lien, wife's lien is superior to any interest of bank in marital property, as the bank was an unsecured creditor whose lien was based on an invalid handwritten note. First Nat'l Bank v. Blackburn, 254 Ga. 379, 329 S.E.2d 897 (1985) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
Applying Canadian law to the facts of the case, a remote purchaser could not prevail over a creditor who had perfected its purchase money security interest in a truck within the time specified by Canadian law. Paccar Fin. Servs., Ltd. v. Johnson, 195 Ga. App. 412, 393 S.E.2d 685 (1990) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- Word "debtor" in former subsection (4) includes transferees who hold proceeds which are validly claimed by secured parties of debtor who initially granted a lien on property which gave rise to the proceeds. Moister v. National Bank (In re Guaranteed Muffler Supply Co.), 1 Bankr. 324 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1979) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- Insurance benefits payable from a third-party tortfeasor's insurer upon the destruction of a vehicle became "proceeds," subject to a lender's security interest, before payment to the victims. JCS Enter., Inc. v. Vanliner Ins., 227 Ga. App. 371, 489 S.E.2d 95 (1997) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- Given the disputed evidence as to the good faith of a transaction, summary judgment awards on the priorities of security interests were not appropriate as the matter had to be remanded to the trial court because the good faith of a transaction was peculiarly a question for the trier of fact. Farm Credit of Northwest Fla., ACA v. Easom Peanut Co., 312 Ga. App. 374, 718 S.E.2d 590 (2011), cert. denied, No. S12C0444, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 315 (Ga. 2012).
Cited in Shepard v. State of Ga., 267 Ga. App. 604, 600 S.E.2d 691 (2004); Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rozier, 278 Ga. 52, 597 S.E.2d 367 (2004); Bank of Dawson v. Worth Gin Co., 295 Ga. App. 256, 671 S.E.2d 279 (2008).
- A debtor may be construed as anyone who owes payment. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Barbree, 162 Ga. App. 512, 291 S.E.2d 453, rev'd on other grounds, 250 Ga. 409, 297 S.E.2d 465 (1982) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
One who is a seller of chattel paper, whether or not that one is the owner of the underlying collateral, with full recourse against the seller in the event of a deficiency is a debtor entitled to notice of the post-default proceedings disposing of the collateral. Barbree v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 250 Ga. 409, 297 S.E.2d 465 (1982) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- Because former § 11-9-504(3) dealt with disposition of collateral after default, "debtor" in that section meant owner of collateral. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Barbree, 162 Ga. App. 512, 291 S.E.2d 453, rev'd on other grounds, 250 Ga. 409, 297 S.E.2d 465 (1982) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- Buyer of cows who had milked and cared for the cows for several weeks prior to obtaining a loan for their purchase, but who did not finally decide to purchase the cows until after buyer obtained the loan was not a "debtor," and did not take possession until the loan was closed. United States v. Hooks, 40 Bankr. 715 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1984) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- Trial court properly granted a surety's motion for summary judgment because the security interest in the accounts owed was covered by the Uniform Commercial Code, and to the extent that the anti-assignment clauses of the construction contract could be construed to prohibit the roofing company from assigning the company's right to those accounts to the company's surety, the contracts were unenforceable as a matter of law under O.C.G.A. § 11-9-406(d)(1). State Dep't of Corr. v. Developers Sur. & Indem. Co., 324 Ga. App. 371, 750 S.E.2d 697 (2013).
- Since former § 11-9-104(j) clearly provided that former Article 9 did not apply to a transfer of an interest in any deposit account, inasmuch as a depositor's commercial checking account is a "deposit account", the structures of that article were not applicable to the bank's appropriation of the account under its right of set-off. Design Spectrum, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank, 182 Ga. App. 418, 355 S.E.2d 733 (1987) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
Money came within the definition of "instrument". In re Atlanta Times, Inc., 259 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Ga. 1966), aff'd sub nom. Sanders v. National Acceptance Co. of Am., 383 F.2d 606 (5th Cir. 1967) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- Under the promissory note, the debtors were consumers who were to pay money to the lender, and the debtor's obligation to do so arose from a transaction involving property that was primarily for the debtors' personal, family, or household purposes; the promissory note was a debt within the plain language of 15 U.S.C. § 1692a(5), and the law firm's letter and enclosed documents were an attempt to collect that debt - the complaint sufficiently alleged that the notice was a communication related to the collection of a debt within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. Even if the firm intended the letter and documents to give notice of the foreclosure to the debtors, the letters also demanded payment on the underlying debt and the fact that the letter and documents related to the enforcement of a security interest did not prevent the letters from also relating to the collection of a debt within the meaning of § 1692e; the complaint contained enough factual content to allow a reasonable inference that the firm was a debt collector because the firm regularly attempted to collect debts. Reese v. Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP, 678 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 2012).
Intent to create a security interest is sole requisite for security agreement. Barton v. Chemical Bank, 577 F.2d 1329 (5th Cir. 1978) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
Financing statement alone cannot serve as "security agreement," however, financing statement accompanied by other documents or circumstances may suffice as valid "security agreement." In re Carmichael Enters., Inc., 334 F. Supp. 94 (N.D. Ga. 1971), aff'd, 460 F.2d 1405 (5th Cir. 1972) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- For security interest to be enforceable, there must be a writing, signed by debtor, which includes "security agreement" as that term is defined, and which describes collateral. In re Carmichael Enters., Inc., 334 F. Supp. 94 (N.D. Ga. 1971), aff'd, 460 F.2d 1405 (5th Cir. 1972) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- Letter agreeing to execute and return financing statement in consideration of creditor's acceptance of debtor's notes to cover its indebtedness and financing statement, taken together, meet requirements for creation of security agreement; which requires that debtor sign security agreement which contains description of collateral. In re Carmichael Enters., Inc., 334 F. Supp. 94 (N.D. Ga. 1971), aff'd, 460 F.2d 1405 (5th Cir. 1972) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
Three-year "lease agreement contract," by which "lessee" would make monthly payments and, at the end of the three years, without any additional payments, would own the leased equipment, was a security agreement and not a lease. National Traveler, Inc. v. Paccom Leasing Corp., 110 Bankr. 619 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1990) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
Agreement which did not stipulate a purchase price but indicated an intent to negotiate a purchase price was a true lease, and not a conditional sale. Chapman v. Avco Fin. Servs. Leasing Co., 193 Ga. App. 147, 387 S.E.2d 391 (1989) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- Despite the fact that the form executed by the debtors did not contain a clause that "granted" a security interest to the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), considering other language in the form, including a heading "Security Agreement (chattels and crops)," a reference to the FmHA as the "Secured Party," and a provision which read: "It is the purpose and intent of this instrument that . . . this instrument shall secure payment of the note," the debtors did grant the FmHA a security interest in crops, livestock and offspring, farm equipment, and farm products. United States v. Hollie, 42 Bankr. 111 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1984) (decided under former Code Section 11-9-102).
- Creditor did not establish that the creditor had a valid security interest under Georgia law because there was no evidence of a specific writing, signed by the debtor, that reflected an intent to create a security interest, and that reasonably identified the personal property as collateral. First Nat'l Bank v. Alba (In re Alba), 429 Bankr. 353 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2008).
Automobile lessor did not, merely by initiating a foreclosure action in regard to the vehicle, thereby acquire any status as a secured party for purposes of obtaining a priority over the holder of a prior validly perfected mechanic's lien. First Nat'l Bank v. Strother Ford, Inc., 188 Ga. App. 749, 374 S.E.2d 203, rev'd on other grounds, 258 Ga. 319, 368 S.E.2d 489 (1988) (decided under former Code Section11-9-102).
- No public record allowed a criminal defendant's parent to perfect an implied trust (based on the parent's allegation that the parent paid for cars but titled them in the son's name for insurance purposes) against bona fide purchaser for value; so, in a O.C.G.A. § 16-13-49 forfeiture proceeding of two cars, the parent was not the statutory "owner" or "interest holder" as those terms were defined in O.C.G.A. § 11-9-102 and O.C.G.A. § 16-13-49(a)(7), (n)(3), (o)(3), (a)(6), and the parent thus lacked standing to contest the forfeiture. McFarley v. State of Ga., 268 Ga. App. 621, 602 S.E.2d 341 (2004).
- 68A Am. Jur. 2d, Secured Transactions, §§ 31-110, 121, 291-293, 471, 474-475, 482-486, 527, 550-554, 777, 780-835, 931-934, 962-982.
Consignment, 1 POF2d 223.
- 72 C.J.S., Pledges, §§ 20, 23, 28, 36. 82 C.J.S., Statutes, § 309.
- Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9-102.
- Realization on security deposited as collateral as interrupting the statute of limitations, 25 A.L.R. 58; 165 A.L.R. 1400.
Note or bond purporting to be given as collateral security for obligation of third person as guaranty or unconditional obligation, 43 A.L.R. 185.
Creditor levying upon subject of unfiled conditional sale contract under prior judgment, 55 A.L.R. 1137.
Interest of vendee under conditional sales contract as subject to attachment, garnishment, or execution, 61 A.L.R. 781.
Lien which attaches under chattel mortgage of livestock to offspring subsequently born, as surviving period of suitable nurture, 144 A.L.R. 330.
What constitutes "accounts receivable" under contract selling, assigning, pledging, or reserving such items, 41 A.L.R.2d 1395.
Rights and duties of parties to conditional sales contract as to resale of repossessed property, 49 A.L.R.2d 15.
Consignment transactions under the Uniform Commercial Code, 40 A.L.R.3d 1078.
Uniform Commercial Code: Burden of proof as to commercially reasonable disposition of collateral, 59 A.L.R.3d 369.
Effectiveness of original financing statement under UCC Article 9 after change in debtor's name, identity, or business structure, 99 A.L.R.3d 1194.
Secured transactions: What constitutes "consumer goods" under UCC § 9-109(1), 77 A.L.R.3d 1225.
Secured Transactions: What constitutes "inventory" under UCC § 9-109(4), 77 A.L.R.3d 1266.
Effect of UCC Article 9 upon conflict, as to funds in debtor's bank account, between secured creditor and bank claiming right of setoff, 3 A.L.R.4th 998.
What is "commercially reasonable" disposition of collateral required by UCC § 9-504(3), 7 A.L.R.4th 308.
What constitutes secured party's authorization to transfer collateral free of lien under UCC § 9-306(2), 37 A.L.R.4th 787.
Secured transactions: government agricultural program payments as "proceeds" of agricultural products under UCC § 9-306, 79 A.L.R.4th 903.
Conveyance of land as including mature but unharvested crops, 51 A.L.R.4th 1263.
Construction mortgagee-lender's duty to protect interest of subordinated purchase-money mortgagee, 13 A.L.R.5th 684.
Consignment transactions under Uniform Commercial Code Article 9 on secured transactions, 58 A.L.R.6th 289.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-06-07
Citation: 597 S.E.2d 367, 278 Ga. 52, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1875, 54 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 31, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 470
Snippet: 11-9-617(a)(1). [15] 292 F.3d at 1354. [16] OCGA § 11-9-102(a)(29) ("debtor" defined as "a person having an
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-03-10
Citation: 301 S.E.2d 40, 250 Ga. 721, 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 951, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 614
Snippet: security interests in "general intangibles." OCGA § 11-9-102 (1) (a) (Code Ann. § 109A-9-102). "General intangibles"