O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 11-9-202 (2019)

Title to collateral immaterial

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as otherwise provided with respect to consignments or sales of accounts, chattel paper, payment intangibles, or promissory notes, the provisions of this article with regard to rights and obligations apply whether title to collateral is in the secured party or the debtor.

History

Code 1981, § 11-9-202, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 362, § 1.

Annotations

Law reviews. For article discussing the resolution of

conflicting claims to goods between an unsecured seller of goods and a creditor of a buyer claiming under an after-acquired property clause, see 28 Mercer L. Rev. 625 (1977).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 68A Am. Jur. 2d, Secured Transactions, § 192 et seq. C.J.S. 72 C.J.S., Pledges, § 21. U.L.A. Uniform Commercial Code (U.L.A.) § 9202. ALR. Forfeiture by innocent vendor of article

sold conditionally and used by vendee in violation of law, 2 A.L.R. 1596. Personal liability for mortgage debt of real owner who procures mortgage to be executed by another, 25 A.L.R. 1486. Claim of lien by conditional vendor as waiver of title, 45 A.L.R. 185. Rights and duties of parties to conditional sales contract as to resale of repossessed property, 49 A.L.R.2d 15.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Kubota Tractor Corp. v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 403 S.E.2d 218 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kubota Tractor Corp. v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 403 S.E.2d 218 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Constituting a typical “security agreement,” Kubota’s agreement with Harvey’s would not vest any property interest in Kubota which would prevent Harvey’s from subsequently vesting an additional security interest in the property in C & S.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.