O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 12-13-1 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known as and may be cited as the ‘‘Georgia Underground Storage Tank Act.’’

History

Code 1981, § 12-13-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 2072, § 1.

Annotations

Law reviews. - For survey article on

construction law for the period from June 1, 2002 through May 31, 2003, see 55 Mercer L. Rev. 85 (2003).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1999–2004 · leading case: Coll. Park Holdings, LLC v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 239 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (N.D. Ga. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Coll. Park Holdings, LLC v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 239 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (N.D. Ga. 2002). · cites it 2× “Ga. Code Ann. §§ 12-13-1 , et seq. (2001).”

Luke v. Dep't of Nat. Resources, 513 S.E.2d 728 (Ga. 1999). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 12-13-1 et seq. The Act requires UST operators to maintain evidence of financial responsibility satisfactory to ensure that there will be funds available to take corrective action and provide compensation in the event of a release from a UST.”

Coll. Park Holdings, LLC v. RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc., 239 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (N.D. Ga. 2002). · cites it 2× “Ga.Code Ann. §§ 12-13-1, 12-13-22 (2001); Ga.”

Prime Retail Dev., Inc. v. Marbury Eng'g Co., 608 S.E.2d 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “To constitute harmful error within the meaning of OCGA § 5-5-24 (c), an erroneous charge or failure to charge must result in a gross injustice, such as to raise a question whether the appellant has been deprived of a fair trial.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.