O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27 (2019)
Standards for handling special solid waste; transportation manifest; fees; inspection; prohibition of waste generated out-of-state; certification
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 1993, p. 399, § 7, effective April 5, 1993.
Annotations
Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Ga. L. 1990, p. 412, § 1 and Ga. L. 1992, p. 3276, § 8.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1992–1995 · leading case: S. States Landfill, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources, 801 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Ga. 1992).
S. States Landfill, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources, 801 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Ga. 1992). “” O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27. Moreover, an applicant must submit a written description of a plan to close the facility at any time during its operation.”
Env't Waste Reductions, Inc. v. Reheis, 887 F. Supp. 1534 (N.D. Ga. 1995). “1992), the federal district court held that Georgia’s special solid waste statute, which included this planning requirement codified at O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27, was unconstitutional on its face because it applied to only out-of-state waste and thus violated the Commerce Clause…”
— 12-8-27(a)(3) — 1 case
S. States Landfill, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources, 801 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Ga. 1992). “” O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27. Moreover, an applicant must submit a written description of a plan to close the facility at any time during its operation.”
— 12-8-27(b) — 1 case
S. States Landfill, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources, 801 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Ga. 1992). “” O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27. Moreover, an applicant must submit a written description of a plan to close the facility at any time during its operation.”
— 12-8-27(c) — 1 case
S. States Landfill, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources, 801 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Ga. 1992). “” O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27. Moreover, an applicant must submit a written description of a plan to close the facility at any time during its operation.”
— 12-8-27(d) — 1 case
S. States Landfill, Inc. v. Georgia Dep't of Nat. Resources, 801 F. Supp. 725 (M.D. Ga. 1992). “” O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27. Moreover, an applicant must submit a written description of a plan to close the facility at any time during its operation.”
— 12-8-27(f) — 1 case
Env't Waste Reductions, Inc. v. Reheis, 887 F. Supp. 1534 (N.D. Ga. 1995). “1992), the federal district court held that Georgia’s special solid waste statute, which included this planning requirement codified at O.C.G.A. § 12-8-27, was unconstitutional on its face because it applied to only out-of-state waste and thus violated the Commerce Clause…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.