
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1929, p. 245, § 2; Code 1933, § 20-602; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 13.)
- Securities regulation, Ch. 5, T. 10.
- The United States Cotton Futures Act, referred to in this Code section, is codified as 7 U.S.C. § 15b.
Although former Code 1933, § 20-602 (see O.C.G.A. § 13-9-2) was explicit, it must be read with Ga. L. 1962, p. 156, § 1 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 11-2-301 and11-2-308(a)). Cone Mills Corp. v. A.G. Estes, Inc., 377 F. Supp. 222 (N.D. Ga. 1974).
Contracts for future delivery of commodities where parties contemplate actual delivery are valid. Taunton v. Allenberg Cotton Co., 378 F. Supp. 34 (M.D. Ga. 1973).
Law does not affect validity of contracts for future delivery of goods where parties contemplate that there shall be actual delivery. R.N. Kelly Cotton Merchant, Inc. v. York, 379 F. Supp. 1075 (M.D. Ga. 1973), aff'd, 494 F.2d 41 (5th Cir. 1974).
Cited in Fenner & Beane v. Calhoun, 56 Ga. App. 823, 194 S.E. 51 (1937); Mitchell-Huntley Cotton Co. v. Lawson, 377 F. Supp. 661 (M.D. Ga. 1973); R.N. Kelly Cotton Merchant, Inc. v. York, 494 F.2d 41 (5th Cir. 1974); R.L. Kimsey Cotton Co. v. Ferguson, 233 Ga. 962, 214 S.E.2d 360 (1975); Cone Mills Corp. v. A.G. Estes, Inc., 399 F. Supp. 938 (N.D. Ga. 1975).
- 17 Am. Jur. 2d, Contracts, §§ 30 et seq., 73. 68 Am. Jur. 2d, Sales, § 206.
- Validity and construction of contract for sale of season's output, 1 A.L.R. 1392; 9 A.L.R. 276; 23 A.L.R. 574.
Nature and validity of "hedging" transactions on the commodity market, 20 A.L.R. 1422.
Validity of transactions in futures, 83 A.L.R. 522.
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by this site's author, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.