O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-2-1410 (2019)

Preservation of remedies of dissolved corporations

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

PART 2

Sec.

Grounds for administrative dissolution. Procedure for and effect of administrative dissolution. Reinstatement following administrative dissolution. Appeal from denial of reinstatement.

PART 2

PART 3

Grounds for judicial dissolution. Procedure for judicial dissolution. Receivership or custodianship. Decree of dissolution.

Grounds for revocation. Procedure for and effect of revocation. Appeal from revocation. PART 4 DOMESTICATION

MISCELLANEOUS Deposit of assets with Office of the State Treasurer.

Application of chapter to foreign corporations domesticated under prior law. Article 16

Article 15

Records and Reports

Foreign Corporations

PART 1

PART 1

Withdrawal of foreign corporation. PART 3

PART 4

Consequences of transacting business without authority. Application for certificate of authority. Amended certificate of authority; conversion of foreign corporation into foreign limited liability company or foreign limited partnership. Effect of certificate of authority. Corporate name of foreign corporation. Registered office and registered agent of foreign corporation. Change of registered office or registered agent of foreign corporation. Resignation of registered agent of foreign corporation. Service on foreign corporation.

Authority to transact business required.

Corporate records. Inspection of records by shareholders.

Sec.

BUSINESS CORPORATIONS Sec.

Scope of inspection right. Court-ordered inspection.

Annual registration for Secretary of State.

PART 2

Article 17

Transition Provisions

Financial statements for shareholders. Other reports to shareholders.

Application of chapter. Application to qualified foreign corporations. Saving provisions.

14-2-390 through 14-2-393 (Article 17), and 14-2-410 through 14-2-411 (Article 18), and was based on Ga. L. 1968, p. 565; Ga. L. 1969, p. 152; Ga. L. 1970, p. 195; Ga. L. 1970, p. 243; Ga. L. 1970, p. 605; Ga. L. 1972, p. 433; Ga. L. 1973, p. 833; Ga. L. 1975, p. 778; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1102; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1576; Ga. L. 1977, p. 324; Ga. L. 1977, p. 649; Ga. L. 1977, p. 1098; Ga. L. 1979, p. 435; Ga. L. 1980, p. 603; Ga. L. 1980, p. 623; Ga. L. 1980, p. 715; Ga. L. 1980, p. 1188; Ga. L. 1981, Ex. Sess., p. 8 (Code enactment Act) and Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, Ga. L. 1982, p. 156, Ga. L. 1982, p. 694, Ga. L. 1982, p. 886, Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, Ga. L. 1983, p. 1299, Ga. L. 1983, p. 1479, Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, Ga. L. 1984, p. 514, Ga. L. 1984, p. 1319, Ga. L. 1985, p. 527, Ga. L. 1985, p. 1281, Ga. L. 1985, p. 1302, Ga. L. 1986, p. 10, Ga. L. 1986, p. 1454, Ga. L. 1987, p. 537, Ga. L. 1987, p. 849, Ga. L. 1987, p. 1448.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070, § 1, effective July 1, 1989, repealed the Code sections formerly codified as this chapter and enacted the current chapter. The former chapter consisted of Code Sections 14-2-1 through 14-2-7 (Article 1), 14-2-20 through 14-2-23 (Article 2), 14-2-40 through 14-2-43 (Article 3), 14-2-60 through 14-2-63 (Article 4), 14-2-80 through 14-2-98 (Article 5), 14-2-110 through 14-2-123 (Article 6), 14-2-140 through 14-2-156 (Article 7), 14-2-170 through 14-2-177 (Article 8), 14-2-190 through 14-2-196 (Article 9), 14-2-210 through 14-2-218 (Article 10), 14-2-230 through 14-2-231 (Article 11), 14-2-250 through 14-2-251 (Article 12), 14-2-270 through 14-2-295 (Article 13), 14-2-310 through 14-2-331 (Article 14), 14-2-350 through 14-2-351 (Article 15), 14-2-370 through 14-2-373 (Article 16),

Table of Comparable Provisions for Chapter 2 of Title 14 This table lists each Code section in the former Business Corporation Code, Ga. L. 1968, p. 565, as amended, and comparable provisions of the new Business Corporation Code, Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070. It is intended to assist the user, who is familiar with the former chapter, to find comparable new provisions. Table entries do not indicate that the former provision was reenacted without change in the new chapter, only that the comparable new provision pertains to the same subject. Absence of a comparable new provision in the table may mean only that there was no new provision similar enough for inclusion in this table, not that the subject is no longer covered.

NEW 14-2-140, 14-2-723 14-2-120, 14-2-1408 14-2-120, 14-2-123, 14-2-124, 14-2-125 14-2-127, 14-2-128

CORPORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS NEW 14-2-502, 14-2-503 - 14-2-621, 14-2-623 14-2-621, 14-2-628 14-2-150, 14-2-625, - 14-2-623, 14-2-640 14-2-631, 14-2-640 - - - - 14-2-701, 14-2-702, 14-2-703, 14-2-704 14-2-141, 14-2-705, 14-2-706, 14-2-823 14-2-705, 14-2-707 14-2-720, 14-2-724 14-2-725, 14-2-727, 14-2-721, 14-2-724, 14-2-727, 14-2-1021 14-2-722, 14-2-724, 14-2-731, 14-2-920 14-2-1601, 14-2-1602, 14-2-1604, 14-2-1620 14-2-740, 14-2-741, 14-2-742, 14-2-745, 14-2-746 14-2-801, 14-2-802, 14-2-803, 14-2-804,

NEW 14-2-805, 14-2-807, 14-2-820, 14-2-824, 14-2-820, 14-2-822, 14-2-640, 14-2-824 14-2-861, 14-2-862, 14-2-851, 14-2-852, 14-2-855, 14-2-856, 14-2-858, 14-2-859, 14-2-202, 14-2-203 - 14-2-206, 14-2-1022 14-2-207, 14-2-303 14-2-1002, 14-2-1003, 14-2-1006, 14-2-1006.1 14-2-1105, 14-2-1105.1 14-2-1105, 14-2-1106

BUSINESS CORPORATIONS NEW 14-2-1302, 14-2-1303 14-2-1301, 14-2-1320, 14-2-1321, 14-2-1322, 14-2-1323, 14-2-1325, 14-2-1326, 14-2-1327, 14-2-1330, 14-2-1331 - 14-2-1402, 14-2-1403 14-2-1403.1, 14-2-1405, 14-2-1420, 14-2-1421, 14-2-1430, 14-2-1431 14-2-940, 14-2-1430, 14-2-1406, 14-2-1408,

NEW 14-2-1405, 14-2-1406, 14-2-1407, 14-2-1408 14-2-1508, 14-2-1509 14-2-1510, 14-2-1520 14-2-1530, 14-2-1531 - 14-2-121, 14-2-130 - - 14-2-126, 14-2-1532 - -

CORPORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS

Law reviews. - For article discussing liability of corporate directors, officers, and shareholders under the Georgia Business Corporation Code, as affected by provisions of the Georgia Civil Practice Act, see 7 Ga. St. B.J. 277 (1971). For annual survey on business associations, see 35 Mercer L. Rev. 37 (1983). For annual survey on business associations, see 36 Mercer L. Rev. 91 (1984). For article, ‘‘Maintaining the Corporation as a Separate Entity,’’ see 23 Ga. St. B. J. 36 (1986). For annual survey of law of business associations, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 57 (1986). For annual survey of cases concerning business associations, see 39 Mercer L. Rev. 53 (1987). For article, ‘‘Changes in Corporate Practice under Georgia’s New Business Corporation Code,’’ see 40 Mercer L. Rev. 655 (1989). For article, ‘‘Georgia’s New Business Corporation Code,’’ see 24 Ga. St. B. J. 158 (1988). For annual survey of law of business associations, see 40 Mercer L. Rev. 61 (1988). For survey article on business associations, see 42 Mercer L. Rev. 71 (1990). For article, ‘‘Some Distinctive Features of the Georgia Business Corporation Code,’’ 28 Ga. St. B. J. 101 (1991). For article, ‘‘The Development of the Shareholder’s Direct Action Damage Remedy,’’ see 28 Ga. St. B. J. 195 (1992). For annual survey of law of business associations, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 85 (1991). For annual survey article on business associ-

ations, see 45 Mercer L. Rev. 53 (1993). For article discussing developments in law of business associations from June 1, 1996 through May 31, 1997, see 49 Mercer L. Rev. 71 (1997). For annual survey article on business associations, see 50 Mercer L. Rev. 171 (1998). For survey article discussing developments in law of business associations for the period from June 1, 1998 through May 31, 1999, see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 127 (1999). For survey article discussing developments in law of business associations for the period from June 1, 1999 through May 31, 2000, see 52 Mercer L. Rev. 95 (2000). For survey article on cases in the areas of corporate, securities, partnership, and banking law for the period from June 1, 2002 through May 31, 2003, see 55 Mercer L. Rev. 55 (2003). For article, ‘‘2006 Amendments to Georgia’s Corporate Code and Alternative Entity Statutes,’’ see 12 Ga. St. B. J. 12 (2007). For note on 1993 amendment of this chapter, see 10 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 74 (1993). For note on 1999 amendments to sections in this chapter, see 16 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 27 (1999). For comment, ‘‘An Empirical Study of Defective Incorporation,’’ see 39 Emory L.J. 523 (1990). For comment, ‘‘Transfers of Intangible Property: Revise §§ 482 and 936(H) to Tax Transfers of Business Functions,’’ see 32 Georgia St. U. L. Rev. 977 (2016).

CODE REVISION COMMISSION NOTE ON COMMENTS The comments appearing in this chapter have been prepared under the supervision of the Georgia Corporation Code Revision Committee of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia and are included in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated at the request of the committee. Neither the General Assembly of Georgia nor the Code Revision Commission of the State of Georgia has participated in the drafting of these comments or has reviewed the comments for their content. The comments should not be considered to constitute a statement of legislative intention by the General Assembly of Georgia nor do they have the force of statutory law. COMMENT NOTE AS TO DRAFTING COMMITTEE The Georgia Business Corporation Code was completely recodified by an Act (Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070) that was based on a draft proposed by the Georgia Business Corporation

Code Revision Committee of the Section of Corporate and Banking Law of the State Bar of Georgia composed of the following: George L. Cohen, Chairman William J. Carney, Reporter, Professor, Emory University Law School Elliott Goldstein, Special Consultant Thomas C. Herman, Secretary W. Hale Barrett

Holcombe T. Green, Jr.

J. Kermit Birchfield, Jr.

Edward J. Hardin

Terry C. Bridges

Donald R. Harkleroad

John W. Collier

Edward J. Hawie

C. Powers Dorsett, Jr.

James L. Smith, III

William E. Eason, Jr.

L. Neil Williams, Jr.

Alan S. Gaynor The Committee was assisted by the following special advisers: Senator Edward Hine, Jr.

Valerie A. Hepburn, Director of Administration, Office of the Secretary of State State of Georgia

Wayne Howell, Deputy Secretary of State Stephanie Manis, Assistant Attorney General

George E. Hibbs, Assistant General Counsel, State Bar of Georgia

Representative Thomas Chambless NOTES AS TO COMMENTS The comments in Chapter 2 of Title 14 were prepared in 1987, 1988, and 1989 by William J. Carney, Charles Howard Candler Professor at Emory University Law School, who was reporter to the Georgia Corporation Code Revision Committee (hereinafter the ‘‘Code Revision Committee’’) of the Corporate and Banking Law Section of the State Bar of Georgia, which submitted a proposed draft of the revised Georgia Business Corporation Code (the ‘‘Code’’) in the form in which it was introduced in the Georgia General Assembly. The Comments were reviewed by the Code Revision Committee, which was chaired by George L. Cohen. They were presented to the General Assembly, in substantially this form, as part of the explanation for the changes proposed from prior law, and to clarify the meaning of the Code. The Comments also note amendments made by the General Assembly to the Code as initially introduced. JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Chapter 2 of Title 14, which was repealed by Ga. L. 1988, p.

1070, § 1, effective July 1, 1989, are included in the annotations for this chapter. Cited in Hullender v. Acts II, 153 Ga. App. 119, 264 S.E.2d 486 (1980).

CORPORATIONS & PARTNERSHIPS

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - What corporate communications are entitled to attorney-client privilege - modern cases, 27 ALR5th 76.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Cross references. - Incorporation of banks and trust companies, § 7-1-390 et seq. Incorporation of condominium associations, § 44-3-100 et seq. Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Changes in Corporate Practice under Georgia’s New Business Corporation Code,’’ see 40 Mercer L. Rev. 655 (1989). For article, ‘‘Georgia’s New Business Corporation

Code,’’ see 24 Ga. St. B. J. 158 (1988). For article, ‘‘Researching Georgia Law,’’ see 3 Ga. St. U. L. Rev 585 (1993). For note surveying revisions to Georgia Condominium Act between 1963 and 1975 regarding expansion, disclosure, liens, and incorporation, see 24 Emory L.J. 891 (1975).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Article 1 of Chapter 2 of Title 14, which was repealed by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1070, § 1, effective July 1, 1989,

are included in the annotations for this article. Cited in Whitley v. Whitley Constr. Co., 121 Ga. App. 696, 175 S.E.2d 128 (1970).

PART 1 SHORT TITLE AND RESERVATION OF POWER

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: Deere & Co. v. Jps Dev., Inc., 592 S.E.2d 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).
Deere & Co. v. Jps Dev., Inc., 592 S.E.2d 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “OCGA § 14-2-1410 provides: The dissolution of a corporation in any manner, except by a decree of the superior court when the court has supervised the liquidation of the assets and business of the corporation as provided in Code Sections 14-2-1430 through 14-2-1433, shall not…”
GC Quality Lubricants, Inc. v. Doherty, Duggan & Rouse Insurors, 697 S.E.2d 871 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 10× “In March 2008, the Defendants answered and moved for summary judgment, arguing that because GC had been administratively dissolved on July 9, 2005, the two-year survival statute for asserting the claims of a dissolved corporation under OCGA § 14-2-1410 had run as of July 9, 2007.”
Clarence L. Martin, P.C. v. Wallace, 546 S.E.2d 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 6× “See OCGA § 14-2-1410. The legislature amended the corporate Code effective July 1, 1996, to preserve certain rights and remedies of dissolved corporations, except those dissolved by a superior court decree.”
H & C Dev., Inc. v. Bershader, 546 S.E.2d 907 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Bershader also asserted that the suit was untimely under OCGA § 14-2-1410 and that H & C’s actual address had not been “reasonably ascertainable” under *548 OCGA § 48-4-45 (a) (2).”
Body of Christ Overcoming Church of God, Inc. v. Brinson, 680 S.E.2d 856 (Ga. 2009). · cites it 2× “Brinson moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted, determining that the prior DeKalb County judgment addressing Kelley’s ability to reincorpó-rate the Church was res judicata as to the validity of the Church’s *614 reincorporation, and hence as to its ability to…”
Ross Et Al. v. Waters, 774 S.E.2d 195 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “In its ruling on venue, the trial court relied upon former OCGA § 14-2-293, now amended as OCGA § 14-2-1410, which provides for the post-dissolution survival of pre-dissolution claims against a corporation.”
In re A & B Assocs., L.P., 593 B.R. 27 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2018). · cites it 2× “2d 871 (2010) (holding that an administratively-dissolved corporation lacked capacity to bring action for property damage after the expiration of the two-year survival statute for asserting claims under O.C.G.A. § 14-2-1410 ); Deere & Co. v. JPS Dev.”
Grubbs v. Cochran (M.D. Ga. 2023). · cites it 2× “In any event, Georgia’s corporate survival statute permits dissolved corporations to engage in litigation for “any right or claim existing prior to such dissolution if action or other proceeding thereon is pending on the date of such dissolution or is commenced within two years…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.