O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 14-3-1420 (2019)

Grounds for administrative dissolution

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary of State may commence a proceeding under Code Section 14-3-1421 to dissolve a corporation administratively if:

(1) The state revenue commissioner has certified to the Secretary of State that the corporation has failed to file a license or occupation tax return and that a period of one year has expired since the last day permitted for timely filing without the filing and payment of all required license and occupation taxes and penalties by the corporation; provided, however, that dissolution proceedings shall be stayed so long as the corporation is contesting, in good faith, in any appropriate proceeding, the alleged grounds for dissolution;

(2) The corporation does not deliver its annual registration to the Secretary of State, together with all required fees and penalties, within 60 days after it is due;

(3) The corporation is without a registered agent or registered office in this state for 60 days or more;

(4) The corporation does not notify the Secretary of State within 60 days that its registered agent or registered office has been changed, that its registered agent has resigned, or that its registered office has been discontinued; or

(5) The corporation pays a fee as required to be collected by the Secretary of State pursuant to the Code by a check or some other form of payment which is dishonored and the corporation or its incorporator or its agent does not submit payment for said dishonored payment within 60 days from notice of nonpayment issued by the Secretary of State.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-3-1420, enacted by Ga. L. 1991, p. 465, § 1; Ga. L. 1993, p. 1231, § 28.)

Annotations

Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘The Development of Nonprofit Corporation Law and an Agenda for Reform,’’ see 34 Emory L.J. 617 (1985).

For note on 1993 amendment of this Code section, see 10 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 74 (1993).

COMMENT Note to 1993 Amendment The 1993 amendment added a new subparagraph (5) which authorizes administrative dissolution if the payment of fees to the Secretary of State is dishonored and not thereafter satisfied within a stated period of time.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS New association had no authority. - In a homeowner’s suit against a new association, the trial court erred by granting the new association summary judgment under the doctrine of corporate continuity because the mere filing of articles of incorporation by the new association was not enough as there was no transfer

of any assets, no vote to incorporate the new association, nor any other act taken by a majority of purported members following the dissolution of the old association to grant the new association any authority. Sager v. Ivy Falls Plantation Homeowners Association, Inc., 339 Ga. App. 111, 793 S.E.2d 455 (2016).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 19 Am. Jur. 2d, Corporations, § 2478 et seq.

C.J.S. - 19 C.J.S., Corporations, §§ 945, 946, 947, 948, 949.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2016–2018 · leading case: Sager v. Ivy Falls Plantation Homeowners' Ass'n, 793 S.E.2d 455 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).
Sager v. Ivy Falls Plantation Homeowners' Ass'n, 793 S.E.2d 455 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “See generally OCGA § 14-3-1420 (grounds for administrative dissolution of a nonprofit corporation).”
Med. Ctr. of Cent. Georgia, Inc. v. MacOn Health Ctr., Inc., 815 S.E.2d 199 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “See OCGA §§ 14-3-1420 ; 14-3-1421; 14-3-1422.”
Cynthia Sager v. Ivy Falls Plantation Homeowners' Ass'n, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “2 In July 2010, Sager purchased a home in the subdivision, and she later came to understand that she was considered a member of New Association. According to an affidavit by Sager, shortly thereafter, a majority of the residents voted to dissolve the New Association, and until…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.