O.C.G.A.

14-9A-2.1 (2019)

Applicability of article

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article is applicable only to limited partnerships to which Chapter 9 of this title or Article 2 of this chapter does not apply as provided by Code Section 14-9-1201 or 14-9A-110.

History

(Code 1981, § 14-9A-2.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 2.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1998–2015 · leading case: Mahalo Investments III, LLC v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co., Inc., 769 S.E.2d 154 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mahalo Investments III, LLC v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co., Inc., 769 S.E.2d 154 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 14-9A-2.1; Prodigy, 269 Ga. at 524, n.”

Prodigy Centers/Atlanta v. T-C Assocs., 501 S.E.2d 209 (Ga. 1998). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 14-9A-2.1. Permitting pre-existing limited partnerships to be governed by prior law is one factor which distinguishes the Georgia version of the RULPA from the Official RULPA, which applies the new act to existing partnerships.”

Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. Bank of Am., N.A., 174 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Ga. 2001). · cites it 2× “See O.C.G.A. §§ 14-9A-2.1, 14-9A-110, 14-9- *1356 1201, 14-9-1202.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.