O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

14-9A-4 (2019)

Rules for cases not provided for by article

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any case not provided for in this article, the rules of law and equity, including the law merchant, shall govern.

History

(Ga. L. 1952, p. 375, § 29; Code 1981, § 14-9-4; Code 1981, § 14-9A-4, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1016, § 1.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 59A Am. Jur. 2d, Partnership, § 764 et seq.

C.J.S. - 68 C.J.S., Partnership, § 556 et seq.

U.L.A. - Uniform Limited Partnership Act (U.L.A.) § 29.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Hendry v. Wells, 650 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hendry v. Wells, 650 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 14-9A-4. A limited partner’s rights under the ULPA are enumerated in OCGA § 14-9A-42 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.