O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 15-11-6 (2019)
Computation of age
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this Code section, a child attains a specified age the first second past midnight on the day of the anniversary of such child’s birth. (b) A child born on February 29 attains a specified age on March 1 of any year that is not a leap year.
History
Code 1981, § 15-11-6, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.
Annotations
Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Georgia’s Juvenile Code: New Law for the New Year,’’ see 19 Ga. St. B. J. 13 (Dec. 2013).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47
cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: In the Interest of P. D. W., 674 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).
In the Interest of P. D. W., 674 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). “The mother asserts that the juvenile court denied her the statutory right to counsel as set forth in OCGA § 15-11-6 (b), which provides: Except as otherwise provided under this article, a party is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of any proceedings…”
In the Interest of J. M. B., 676 S.E.2d 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). “quite evident that the entire legislative scheme written into the pertinent provisions of the Juvenile Code was intended to provide to an indigent parent effective representation at all stages of any proceeding involving the termination of that parent’s right to his or her child.”
In the Interest of Z. K., 645 S.E.2d 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). “See also OCGA§ 15-11-6 (b) (indigent parent’s right to appointed counsel “at all stages of any proceedings” alleging his or her child is deprived, delinquent, unruly, or incorrigible); In the Interest of A.”
In the Interest of W. L. H., 739 S.E.2d 322 (Ga. 2013). “Our Juvenile Code extends this right to legal representation to a child who (1) is not represented by a parent, guardian, or custodian during the proceedings or (2) has a conflict of interest with that adult or any other party.”
In the Interest of J. L. B., 634 S.E.2d 514 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). “OCGA § 15-11-6 (b). OCGA §§ 15-11-7 (a); 15-11-65 (b).”
In the Interest of A. J., 604 S.E.2d 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). “, supra; see also OCGA § 15-11-6 (b) (“[A] party is entitled to *582 representation by legal counsel at all stages of any proceedings alleging delinquency, unruliness, incorrigibility, or deprivation and if, as an indigent person, a party is unable to employ counsel, he or she…”
Long v. Long, 692 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). “” 18 See OCGA § 15-11-6 (b); Williams v. Dept. of Human Resources, 150 Ga.”
In Re Burton, 521 S.E.2d 568 (Ga. 1999). “OCGA § 15-11-6 (b). The juvenile *492 court entered a final order which was adverse to Ms.”
In the Interest of B. B., 599 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). “See OCGA § 15-11-6 (b); In the Interest of B.”
Hall v. Hall, 527 S.E.2d 288 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “Although the trial court found that it could appoint a guardian ad litem for the Halls’ daughter under either OCGA § 15-11-6 or § 9-11-17 (c), neither of those statutes applies to their daughter.”
In the Interest of B. R. F., a Child, 770 S.E.2d 912 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). “And see former OCGA § 15-11-6 (b) (2012) (a “party is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of any proceedings alleging .”
In the Interest of K. M. C., 614 S.E.2d 896 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). “The mother bases her entitlement to counsel on OCGA § 15-11-6 (b): Except as otherwise provided under this article, a party is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of any *283 proceedings alleging delinquency, unruliness, incorrigibility, or deprivation and…”
— 15-11-6(a) — 2 cases
In Re Aj, 604 S.E.2d 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Pdw, 674 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).
— 15-11-6(b) — 14 cases
In Re Kmc, 614 S.E.2d 896 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Aj, 604 S.E.2d 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Zk, 645 S.E.2d 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).
In Re Pdw, 674 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re Jlb, 634 S.E.2d 514 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.