✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this Code section, a child attains a specified age the first second past midnight on the day of the anniversary of such child’s birth.
(b) A child born on February 29 attains a specified age on March 1 of any year that is not a leap year.
History
Code 1981, § 15-11-6, enacted by Ga. L. 2013, p. 294, § 1-1/HB 242.
Annotations
Law reviews. - For article, ‘‘Georgia’s Juvenile Code: New Law for the New Year,’’ see 19 Ga. St. B. J. 13 (Dec. 2013).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47
cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: In the Interest of P. D. W., 674 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).
In the Interest of P. D. W., 674 S.E.2d 338 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 6דThe mother asserts that the juvenile court denied her the statutory right to counsel as set forth in OCGA § 15-11-6 (b), which provides: Except as otherwise provided under this article, a party is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of any proceedings…”
In the Interest of J. M. B., 676 S.E.2d 9 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4דquite evident that the entire legislative scheme written into the pertinent provisions of the Juvenile Code was intended to provide to an indigent parent effective representation at all stages of any proceeding involving the termination of that parent’s right to his or her child.”
In the Interest of Z. K., 645 S.E.2d 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 6דSee also OCGA§ 15-11-6 (b) (indigent parent’s right to appointed counsel “at all stages of any proceedings” alleging his or her child is deprived, delinquent, unruly, or incorrigible); In the Interest of A.”
In the Interest of W. L. H., 739 S.E.2d 322 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 6דOur Juvenile Code extends this right to legal representation to a child who (1) is not represented by a parent, guardian, or custodian during the proceedings or (2) has a conflict of interest with that adult or any other party.”
In the Interest of J. L. B., 634 S.E.2d 514 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4דOCGA § 15-11-6 (b). OCGA §§ 15-11-7 (a); 15-11-65 (b).”
In the Interest of A. J., 604 S.E.2d 635 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 8ד, supra; see also OCGA § 15-11-6 (b) (“[A] party is entitled to *582 representation by legal counsel at all stages of any proceedings alleging delinquency, unruliness, incorrigibility, or deprivation and if, as an indigent person, a party is unable to employ counsel, he or she…”
Long v. Long, 692 S.E.2d 811 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2ד” 18 See OCGA § 15-11-6 (b); Williams v. Dept. of Human Resources, 150 Ga.”
In Re Burton, 521 S.E.2d 568 (Ga. 1999). · cites it 4דOCGA § 15-11-6 (b). The juvenile *492 court entered a final order which was adverse to Ms.”
In the Interest of B. B., 599 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2דSee OCGA § 15-11-6 (b); In the Interest of B.”
Hall v. Hall, 527 S.E.2d 288 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4דAlthough the trial court found that it could appoint a guardian ad litem for the Halls’ daughter under either OCGA § 15-11-6 or § 9-11-17 (c), neither of those statutes applies to their daughter.”
In the Interest of B. R. F., a Child, 770 S.E.2d 912 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4דAnd see former OCGA § 15-11-6 (b) (2012) (a “party is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of any proceedings alleging .”
In the Interest of K. M. C., 614 S.E.2d 896 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 10דThe mother bases her entitlement to counsel on OCGA § 15-11-6 (b): Except as otherwise provided under this article, a party is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of any *283 proceedings alleging delinquency, unruliness, incorrigibility, or deprivation and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.