O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-12-62 (2019)

Selection of grand jurors

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-28/HB 415, effective July 1, 2012.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Ga. L. 1869, p. 139, § 2; Code 1873, § 3911; Ga. L. 1874, p. 20, § 1; Code 1882, § 3911; Penal Code 1895, § 822; Penal Code 1910, § 823; Code 1933, § 59-203; Ga. L. 1966, p. 470, § 1;

Ga. L. 1975, p. 809, § 1; Ga. L. 1976, p. 438, § 7; Ga. L. 1987, p. 953, § 2; Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-28/HB 415, and was repealed on its own terms, effective July 1, 2012.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2011 · leading case: Pope v. State, 345 S.E.2d 831 (Ga. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pope v. State, 345 S.E.2d 831 (Ga. 1986). · cites it 8× “[2] (c) Relying upon OCGA § 15-12-62, Pope contends the Cobb County traverse jury venire was improperly drawn and that his challenge to the array was erroneously overruled.”
Kenerly v. State, 715 S.E.2d 688 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “When the legislature did so intend, it made a specific reference: OCGA § 15-12-100 makes reference to OCGA § 15-12-62 (how members may be drawn) and OCGA § 15-12-67 (how the foreman is selected).”
Willie Santonio Manders v. Thurman Lee, 338 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2002). “O.C.G.A. §§ 15-12-62, 15-12-68. Given that many state offenders serve time in county jails, the State legislature also requires that grand juries each year "inspect the condition and operations of the county jail,” O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.