O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 15-12-75 (2019)
Inspection of offices and records of certain county officials by grand jury
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 1994, p. 607, § 5, effective July 1, 1994.
Annotations
Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Laws 1829, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 195; Code 1863, § 3831; Code 1868, § 3852; Code 1873, § 3920; Ga. L. 1877, p. 116, § 1; Code 1882, §§ 3920,
1263a; Penal Code 1895, § 836; Ga. L. 1901, p. 57, § 1; Ga. L. 1905, p. 107, § 2; Penal Code 1910, § 840; Code 1933, § 59-309.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1985–1996 · leading case: Parks v. State, 330 S.E.2d 686 (Ga. 1985).
Parks v. State, 330 S.E.2d 686 (Ga. 1985). “See OCGA §§ 15-12-75, 76, 77, 78, 79 and 80. The age disparities shown here are acceptable.”
State v. Bartel, 479 S.E.2d 4 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). “As far as we can tell from the opinion in Inman, the grand jury with which it was concerned was a regular grand jury apparently drawing'its authority from OCGA § 15-12-75, since repealed, which contained no language regarding evidence and witnesses similar to that in OCGA §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.