O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-18-23 (2019)

Office expenses

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The governing authority of the county or counties comprising each judicial circuit shall provide all offices, utilities, telephone expenses, materials, and supplies as may be necessary to equip, maintain, and furnish the office or offices of the district attorney in an orderly and efficient manner.

History

(Code 1933, § 24-2919, enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 1257, § 8.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Judicial denial of budget cuts deemed proper. - Trial court exercised proper caution in denying a requested writ of mandamus to require county commissioners to restore budget cuts for the district attorney's office. Wilson v. Southerland, 258 Ga. 479, 371 S.E.2d 382 (1988).

Cited in Hudson v. State, 248 Ga. 397, 283 S.E.2d 271 (1981).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2024 · leading case: Wilson v. Southerland, 371 S.E.2d 382 (Ga. 1988).
Wilson v. Southerland, 371 S.E.2d 382 (Ga. 1988). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 15-18-23 requires the county or counties comprising each judicial circuit to provide all offices, utilities, telephone expenses, materials and supplies necessary for an orderly and efficient district attorney's office.”
Gonzalez v. Miller, 907 S.E.2d 859 (Ga. 2024). “”); § 15-18-23 (describing how the offices, expenses, and supplies of district attorneys’ offices are to be paid); § 15-18-28 (a) (emphasizing that “each personnel position in the office of a district attorney .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.