O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-10-95 (2019)

Barratry; penalty

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2006, p. 69, § 1/HB 804, effective July 1, 2006.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Laws 1833, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 808; Code 1863, §§ 4388, 4389;

Code 1868, §§ 4429, 4430; Code 1873, §§ 4501, 4502; Code 1882, §§ 4501, 4502; Ga. L. 1895, p. 64, § 1; Penal Code 1895,

§§ 325, 327; Penal Code 1910, §§ 330, 332; Code 1933, § 26-4701; Ga. L. 1960, p.

1135, § 3; Code 1933, § 26-2406, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–1999 · leading case: Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, 921 F.2d 1465 (11th Cir. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, 921 F.2d 1465 (11th Cir. 1991). · cites it 5× “Pelletier also alleges that Culpepper and Zweifel, acting in concert, violated the Georgia barratry statute, Ga.Code Ann. § 16-10-95. This court is left again to its own devices to substantiate Pelletier’s allegations.”
State v. Duffey, 981 P.2d 1 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999). “§ 53-264 (West 1994); Ga. Code Ann. § 16-10-95 (Harrison 1998); Idaho Code § 18-1001 (1997); 720 Ill.”
Reynolds v. State, 406 S.E.2d 553 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Appellant was convicted of rape (OCGA § 16-6-1), burglary (OCGA § 16-7-1), and simple battery (OCGA § 16-10-95). The defense to rape was consent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.