O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-10-97 (2019)

Intimidation or injury of any officer in or of any court

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A person who by threat or force or by any threatening action, letter, or communication: (1) Endeavors to intimidate or impede any grand juror or trial juror or any officer in or of any court of this state or any court of any county or municipality of this state or any officer who may be serving at any proceeding in any such court while in the discharge of such juror’s or officer’s duties; (2) Injures any grand juror or trial juror in his or her person or property on account of any indictment or verdict assented to by him or her or on account of his or her being or having been such juror; or (3) Injures any officer in or of any court of this state or any court of any county or municipality of this state or any officer who may be serving at any proceeding in any such court in his or her person or property on account of the performance of his or her official duties

shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $5,000.00 or by imprisonment for not more than 20 years, or both. (b) As used in this Code section, the term ‘‘any officer in or of any court’’ means a judge, attorney, clerk of court, deputy clerk of court, court reporter, community supervision officer, county or Department of Juvenile Justice juvenile probation officer, or probation officer serving pursuant to Article 6 of Chapter 8 of Title 42. (c) A person who by threat or force or by any threatening action, letter, or communication endeavors to intimidate any law enforcement officer, outside the scope and course of his or her employment, or his or her immediate family member in retaliation or response to the discharge of such officer’s official duties shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years, a fine not to exceed $5,000.00, or both.

History

(Code 1981, § 16-10-97, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 391, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 14, § 16; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 16; Ga. L. 2010, p. 999, § 2/HB 1002; Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-63/HB 415; Ga. L. 2012, p. 623, § 1/HB 541; Ga. L. 2015, p. 422, § 5-25/HB 310.)

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - Ga. L. 2011, p. 59, § 1-1/HB 415, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: ‘‘This Act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Jury Composition Reform Act of 2011.’ ’’ Ga. L. 2015, p. 422, § 6-1/HB 310, not

codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that this Act shall apply to sentences entered on or after July 1, 2015. Law reviews. - For article on the 2015 amendment of this Code section, see 32 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 231 (2015).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS O.C.G.A. § 16-10-97(a)(1) was unconstitutional as applied to the defendant, because there was no reference to any form of violence in the defendant’s communications, not even an intimation of such. Harrell v. State, 297 Ga. 884, 778 S.E.2d 196 (2015). Phrase ‘‘while in the discharge of such . . . officer’s duties’’ was intended simply to limit the application of O.C.G.A. § 16-10-97(1) to those situations which arise out of or are related to the performance of the court officer’s official duties, whether the proscribed activities occur

while the court officer is actively engaged on the matter giving rise to the offense or whether the proscribed activities occur at some other juncture. Moon v. State, 199 Ga. App. 94, 404 S.E.2d 273 (1991), cert. denied, 199 Ga. App. 906, 404 S.E.2d 273 (1991). Contract probation employee is officer of the court. - Trial court did not err in determining that a contract probation employee is an officer of the court within the meaning of O.C.G.A. § 16-10-97. Edwards v. State, 247 Ga. App. 835, 545 S.E.2d 143 (2001).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Threats of violence against juror in criminal trial as ground for mistrial or dismissal of juror, 3 A.L.R.5th 963. Construction and application of § 2A6.1

of United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG § 2A6.1), pertaining to sentence to be imposed for making threatening communications, 148 A.L.R. Fed. 501.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2026 · leading case: Harrell v. State, 778 S.E.2d 196 (Ga. 2015).
Harrell v. State, 778 S.E.2d 196 (Ga. 2015). · cites it 22× “At the time of the acts alleged in Harrell’s indictment, OCGA § 16-10-97 read: (a) A person who by threat or force or by any threatening action, letter, or communication: (1) Endeavors to intimidate or impede any grand juror or trial juror or any officer in or of any court of…”
Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus Cmty. Trust, 780 S.E.2d 311 (Ga. 2015). · cites it 12× “On appeal, the Task Force alleges the special master and the trial court erred in failing to find an issue of material fact existed as to whether the defendants had intimidated court officers in violation of OCGA § 16-10-97 27 **240 as one of the *327 predicate acts and erred…”
Moon v. State, 404 S.E.2d 273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 10× “Defendant Walter Ted Moon was charged with intimidation of a court officer (OCGA § 16-10-97 (1)), carrying a concealed weapon and loitering or prowling.”
In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 94-70, 454 S.E.2d 780 (Ga. 1995). · cites it 4× “[2] Relying upon this statement, O'Neal obtained felony warrants from a magistrate from a distant county, two months after this statement was made, against the members of the Board for intimidation of a court officer in violation of OCGA § 16-10-97. O'Neal held the warrants in…”
Edwards v. State, 545 S.E.2d 143 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 8× “Edwards contends (1) that his probation should not have been revoked based upon a violation of OCGA § 16-10-97 because a probation officer is not an “officer in or of any court” protected by that Code section and (2) our Supreme Court’s holding in Parrish v.”
In the Matter of Millard C. Farmer, Jr, 307 Ga. 307 (Ga. 2019). · cites it 2× “, for multiple acts of racketeering, including attempted theft by extortion, in violation of OCGA § 16-8-16; attempted bribery, in violation of OCGA § 16-10-2; intimidation of a court officer, in violation of OCGA § 16-10-97; influencing witnesses, in violation of OCGA §…”
State v. Steven Cerajewski, 820 S.E.2d 67 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “*454 The State appeals from the trial court's grant of Steven Cerajewski's special demurrer and quashal of an indictment that charged him with one count of making a false statement in violation of OCGA § 16-10-20 and three counts of impeding a court officer in violation of OCGA…”
In the Matter of Andrew Thurston Murphy (Ga. 2026). · cites it 2× “Court Officer pursuant to OCGA § 16-10-97 in the Superior Court of Cobb County.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.