O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-11-170 (2019)

Intent to provide state background check law; construction of part

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 2005, p. 613, § 1/SB 175, effective July 1, 2005.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Code 1981, § 16-11-170, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 139, § 2; Ga. L.

1999, p. 81, § 16; Ga. L. 2000, p. 136, § 16.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Sturm, Ruger & Co. v. City of Atlanta, 560 S.E.2d 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sturm, Ruger & Co. v. City of Atlanta, 560 S.E.2d 525 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “In this case, preemption can be inferred from the comprehensive nature of the statutes regulating firearms in Georgia, among which are the Georgia Firearms and Weapons Act, codified at OCGA § 16-11-125, and OCGA §§ 16-11-126 through 16-11-134, the Brady Handgun Violence…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.