O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-9-103 (2019)

Venue

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purpose of venue under this part, any violation of this part shall be considered to have been committed:

(1) In the county of the principal place of business in this state of the owner of an involved protected computer, computer network, or any part thereof;

(2) In any county in which any person alleged to have violated any provision of this part had control or possession of any proceeds of the violation or of any books, records, documents, or property which were used in furtherance of the violation;

(3) In any county in which any act was performed in furtherance of any transaction which violated this part; and

(4) In any county from which, to which, or through which any use of an involved protected computer or computer network was made, whether by wires, electromagnetic waves, microwaves, or any other means of communication.

History

(Code 1981, § 16-9-103, enacted by Ga. L. 2005, p. 199, § 4/SB 62.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Pandora Franchising, LLC v. Kingdom Retail Group, LLLP, 299 Ga. 723, 791 S.E.2d 786 (2016).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: Pandora Franchising, LLC v. Kingdom Retail Grp., LLLP, 791 S.E.2d 786 (Ga. 2016).
Pandora Franchising, LLC v. Kingdom Retail Grp., LLLP, 791 S.E.2d 786 (Ga. 2016). · cites it 2× “iness in this state”); OCGA § 10-14-13 (establishing venue for actions to enforce laws governing cemetery and funeral services to the county of the violator’s “principal place of business in this state”); OCGA § 16-9-94 (1) (establishing venue for enforcement of laws governing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.