O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 18-4-83 (2019)

Order for hearing on defendant’s claim

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

“IN THE

Plaintiff v. Defendant Garnishee

STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action File No. ) ) ) ) ) )

ORDER FOR HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S CLAIM It is hereby ordered that a hearing be held upon the Defendant’s claim before this court on the day of , 20 , at : . M., and that the Clerk of Court shall transmit a copy of the Defendant’s Claim Form and this order to the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and the Garnishee. This day of , 20 .

Court of

Judge, County

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I have this day served the Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s Attorney, the Defendant, and the Garnishee in the foregoing matter

with a copy of this pleading by depositing it in the United States Mail in a properly addressed envelope with adequate postage thereon. This day of , 20 . Deputy Clerk of Court”

History

Code 1981, § 18-4-83, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 8, § 1/SB 255.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2015 · leading case: Strickland v. Alexander, 153 F. Supp. 3d 1397 (N.D. Ga. 2015).
Strickland v. Alexander, 153 F. Supp. 3d 1397 (N.D. Ga. 2015). · cites it 4× “Strickland alleged that by not requiring any notice to a debtor that a garnishee has filed an answer, even though the debtor has only 15 days to traverse that answer and file an exemption claim, O.C.G.A. § 18-4-83 failed to conform to due process notice'requirements.”
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Johnson (In re Johnson), 479 B.R. 159 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2012). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 18-4-83. The creditor must give notice of the garnishment action to the judgment debt- or.”
Lowery v. Dallis, 513 S.E.2d 740 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “” OCGA § 18-4-83 provides that all answers by the garnishee shall be served upon the plaintiff or his attorney concurrently with filing, so long as the name and address of the plaintiff or his attorney appear on the face of the summons of garnishment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.