O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-11-133 (2019)

Personal jurisdiction

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Participation by a petitioner in a proceeding under this article before a responding tribunal, whether in person, by private attorney, or through services provided by the support enforcement agency, does not confer personal jurisdiction over the petitioner in another proceeding. (b) A petitioner is not amenable to service of civil process while physically present in this state to participate in a proceeding under this article. (c) The immunity granted by this Code section does not extend to civil litigation based on acts unrelated to a proceeding under this article committed by a party while physically present in Georgia to participate in the proceeding.

History

Code 1981, § 19-11-133, enacted by Ga.

L. 1997, p. 1613, § 33; Ga. L. 2013, p. 705, § 1/SB 193.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Corporation lacked standing to dispute withholding under Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. - Trial court did not err in dismissing a corporation’s petition seeking income withholding for child support because even when taken as true the allegations in the petition established that the corporation lacked

standing to contest the income withholding order under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, O.C.G.A. § 19-11-100 et seq., specifically O.C.G.A. § 19-11101(19). Anderson Anesthesia, Inc. v. Anderson, 333 Ga. App. 437, 776 S.E.2d 647, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 323 (2015).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: Anderson Anesthesia, Inc. v. Anderson, 776 S.E.2d 647 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Anderson Anesthesia, Inc. v. Anderson, 776 S.E.2d 647 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “5 The Georgia trial court also found that the mere filing by Anne of an income assignment order in Georgia did not give the court personal jurisdiction over her, citing OCGA § 19-11-133 (a). That provision states that “[p] articipation by a petitioner in a proceeding under this…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.