O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-13-52 (2019)

Purpose of registry; maintenance; access to information; linking to National Crime Information Center Network

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Georgia Protective Order Registry shall be created to serve as a state-wide, centralized data base for the collection of protective orders. The registry is intended to enhance victim safety by providing law enforcement officers, prosecuting attorneys, and the courts access to protective orders issued by the courts of this state and foreign courts 24 hours of the day and seven days of the week. Access to the registry is intended to aid law enforcement officers, prosecuting attorneys, and the courts in the enforcement of protective orders and the protection to victims.

(b) The registry shall be maintained by the Georgia Crime Information Center. The Georgia Commission on Family Violence may consult with the Georgia Crime Information Center regarding the effectiveness of the registry in enhancing the safety of victims. (c) The registry shall include a complete and systematic record and index of all protective orders and modifications thereof. Law enforcement officers and the courts shall have access to the registry. (d) The registry shall be linked to the National Crime Information Center Network, and protective orders or modifications thereof entered in the registry shall be immediately transmitted to such network.

History

Code 1981, § 19-13-52, enacted by Ga.

L. 2001, p. 101, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p. 321, § 1; Ga. L. 2015, p. 1349, § 3/HB 452.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2024 · leading case: Birchby v. Carboy, 716 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011).
Birchby v. Carboy, 716 S.E.2d 592 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 19-13-52 (a) provides: The Georgia Protective Order Registry shall be created to serve as a centralized data base for state-wide protective orders issued pursuant to Code Sections 16-5-90 through 16-5-94 and this chapter.”
Wildes v. Clark., 819 S.E.2d 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 19-13-52. Every family violence protective order must be transmitted to the Registry, without exception.”
Miller v. Georgia Dep't of Cmty. Supervision (M.D. Ga. 2024). · cites it 2× “” O.C.G.A. § 19-13-52(a), (c). The Eleventh Circuit has held that “the stigmatizing effect of being classified as a sex offender constitutes a deprivation of liberty under the Due Process Clause,” and therefore “[a]n inmate who has never been convicted of a sex crime is entitled…”
— 19-13-52(a) — 1 case
Miller v. Georgia Dep't of Cmty. Supervision (M.D. Ga. 2024). “” O.C.G.A. § 19-13-52(a), (c). The Eleventh Circuit has held that “the stigmatizing effect of being classified as a sex offender constitutes a deprivation of liberty under the Due Process Clause,” and therefore “[a]n inmate who has never been convicted of a sex crime is entitled…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.