O.C.G.A.
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
As used in this part, the term: (1) “Petitioner” means a person who seeks enforcement of an order for return of a child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or enforcement of a child custody determination. (2) “Respondent” means a person against whom a proceeding has been commenced for enforcement of an order for return of a child under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or enforcement of a child custody determination.
History
Code 1981, § 19-9-81, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 129, § 1.
Annotations
RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Construction and application of provision of Hague convention on civil aspects of international child abduction specifying one-year period for parent to file for return of child wrongfully removed from or
retained outside country of habitual residence, as implemented in International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 11603(b), (f)(3), 79 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 481.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 2012–2012 · leading case:
Delgado v. Combs, 724 S.E.2d 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
Delgado v. Combs, 724 S.E.2d 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 4× “44 See OCGA § 19-9-41; OCGA § 19-9-81. 45 See Tyszcenko v. Donatelli, 670 SE2d 49, 55 (II) (Va.”
In the Interest of E. E. B. W., 733 S.E.2d 369 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× ““[Child custody proceeding] does not include a proceeding involving juvenile delinquency, contractual emancipation, or enforcement under Part 3 of this article [OCGA §§ 19-9-81 thru 19-9-97].” OCGA § 19-9-41 (4).”
In the Interest Of: E. E. B. W. (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “The term does not include an order relating to child support or other monetary obligations of an individual.” OCGA § 19-9-41 (3). 2 “[Child custody proceeding] does not include a proceeding involving juvenile deliquency, contractual emancipation, or enforcement under Part 3 of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.